My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-2006 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
02-22-2006 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2012 9:30:01 AM
Creation date
3/29/2012 9:24:43 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 25, 2006 <br />with MN DOT on this issue, they also have Loucks & Associates is <br />working on some on -site ponding for the Extreme Beverage proposal. <br />Keis stated that the supported the Extreme Beverage proposal given that <br />they would not require outdoor storage. Keis noted that outdoor storage <br />has been an issue in the City, and felt that having to work with multiple <br />owners on outdoor storage issues would be very problematic. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that the proposal submitted by Mr. <br />Coatney would comply with the Code relative to outdoor storage. The <br />Administrator pointed out that the issue he was hearing was that the <br />Extreme Beverage proposal includes no outdoor storage and would be <br />own property owner, versus the Coatney proposal that includes limited <br />outdoor storage with multiple owners. <br />Montour stated that he was disappointed that the developers of the assisted <br />living proposal did not take another look at the value of the property, as he <br />would like to see this type of housing in Little Canada. Montour <br />suggested that perhaps there are other sites in the City that would be better <br />suited to this type of development. Montour noted that the Coatney <br />proposal provides the opportunity for six additional businesses to locate in <br />Little Canada while the Extreme Beverage proposal would add one <br />business. However, given the outdoor storage issue and the fact that <br />Extreme Beverage is proposing no outdoor storage, he would support that <br />proposal <br />Montour introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -1 -17 - ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF <br />EXTREME BEVERAGE (TOPC) FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE <br />CITY'S COUNTY ROAD B PROPERTY, AND AUTHORIZING THE <br />MAYOR AND CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE THE <br />APPROPRIATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH TOPC <br />UTILIZING THE CITY'S STANDARD PURCHASE AGREEMENT <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Blesener. <br />Ayes (3). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />ST:,J,UDE The City Administrator reported that St. Jude Medical is interested in a <br />LAND' portion of the City's booster station property on County Road B for <br />TRANSFER additional ponding as well as future parking at the time they do another <br />addition to their facility. The Administrator noted that while the land has <br />value, he was suggesting that the property be transferred to St. Jude <br />Medical. The Administrator pointed out that St. Jude requested no tax <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.