My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-2005 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
02-23-2005 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2014 1:51:48 PM
Creation date
4/13/2012 10:08:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IN, N ES <br />Parks Sc Recreation Commission <br />November 2, 2000 <br />Gray recommended that City staff begin the process of acquiring property to complete th, • <br />City's trail system by tatking to landowners, with frequent updates to be given to the <br />Commission. <br />Motion seconded by Sackett Glaser. <br />1Yfotion carried 6 — 0. <br />ON- STREET The City Administrator stated that the Council recently restricted parking on roads with <br />PARKING on- street pedestrian paths since it was felt that parking on the streets could present a <br />hazardous situation to pedestrians. The streets were posted as "no parking" and now the City <br />has received complaints from residents who want to park on the streets. At the same time, <br />there are several people who feel that the signs are definitely needed. The Administrator <br />commented that residents can apply for parking permits for special occasions where on- street <br />parking is needed. However, there are some residents who stated they may have guests over <br />on the spur of the moment so they would not have time to obtain such a penult. <br />Gray stated that streets with on- street pedestrian paths were widened specifically for use by <br />pedestrians, not cars. He felt that the signs should remain. <br />The City Administrator stated that some streets have busier pedestrian traffic than others, and <br />perhaps they warrant a different approach. Sackett Glaser felt that the same policy should be <br />implemented City-wide, otherwise some residents will feel they are not being treated fairly. <br />Anderson suggested posting only one side of the streets as "no parking." Sackett Glaser did <br />not like this idea since pedestrians are always supposed to be walking against traffic. <br />Sackett Glaser stated that residents on Edgerton Street and Keller Parkway have been living <br />with "no parking" on their street with few complaints. <br />The Director stated that pedestrian and automobile traffic are not a good mix. He felt that in <br />the future, on- street paths should not be approved. The City should approve off - street paths <br />only. He commented that he sympathizes with the residents who want to park on their <br />streets, but he felt that pedestrian safety must come first. He felt that since the City has <br />designated these as pedestrian walk areas, the City has a duty to protect those pedestrians <br />while they are using the walk areas. Sackett Glaser stated that in future developments, the <br />people should at least be informed that if on- street paths are installed, no parking will be <br />allowed. The City Administrator stated that could be more clearly emphasized in the <br />improvement process. <br />Sackett Glaser recommended retaining the City's policy of "no parking" on City streets <br />that contain striped on- street pedestrian paths. <br />_Motion seconded by Gray. <br />_Motion carried ri — 0. <br />lave <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.