Laserfiche WebLink
Following the meeting of September 1S`, the developer proposed that Magellan would allow <br />them to lower pipeline by approximately seven feet in the vicinity of Preserve Court and <br />Preserve Trail. As a result, their final plat submittals are based on this assumption and this <br />allows them to revise the layout of the development in a manner that is much more acceptable <br />to City Staff. <br />Some important factors to consider are that Staff has not seen any evidence from Magellan <br />that they will allow the pipeline to be lowered. Staff is also unclear as to whether just one or <br />all three of the pipelines need to be lowered. Lastly, no plans on how this work would be <br />accomplished and what impacts, if any, the lowering of the pipeline(s) would have on other <br />components of the development. Therefore, factors such as timing of the work relative to <br />other project activities, conditions imposed by Magellan, safety measures to be taken to <br />protect the neighborhood, permits required by other agencies such as the Minnesota Office of <br />Pipeline Safety, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, or other regulatory agencies can not <br />be evaluated at this time and any approvals granted must include conditions that allow the <br />City to ensure this work in done in an appropriate manner and does not create any negative <br />impacts on the project. <br />Finally, staff is also aware that another location of Preserve Trail may be possible. To date, <br />documentation of this possibility has not been received from either the affected property <br />owner or the developer. Therefore, we are unable to comment on the feasibility of this <br />approach. However, if another connection point is possible that allows the developer to more <br />easily transition between grades and avoids the need for lowering the pipeline(s), staff would <br />encourage the developer's pursuit of this option. <br />In light of the preceding comments, staff will update you on what has changed since the <br />denial of the final plat that occurred in August of 2003. The previous findings are in italicized <br />print and our new comments are in bold and labeled as "Commentary ". The review is as <br />follows: <br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br />SUPPORTING DENIAL OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR <br />THE PRESERVE <br />Based upon the submittals of June 12, 2003, the proposed final plat of The <br />Preserve is deficient in regards to compliance with provisions of the Little <br />Canada Subdivision Ordinance as follows <br />• 1001.080 This provision states, "Whenever there is a difference <br />between minimum standards or dimensions specified herein and those <br />contained in other official regulations, resolutions or ordinances of the <br />City, the most restrictive standards shall apply. <br />Developer proposes to grant the City a 50 -road right-of -way that is <br />encumbered by an existing Williams Pipeline easement. In Little Canada <br />City Code Chapter 2302, .it states, `In order to provide for the health, <br />safety and well -being of its citizens, as well as to insure the structural <br />integrity of its streets and the use of the rights-of-way, the City strives to <br />keep its rights-of-way in a state of good repair and free from unnecessary <br />