My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-2005 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
09-28-2005 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2012 2:25:53 PM
Creation date
4/23/2012 2:13:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commentary: Proposed protective covenants were submitted with the final plat. <br />Staff will make a number of recommendations regarding modifications that <br />should be made to this document later in this memo. <br />• 1005.020 (d) 3. No soil survey information has been submitted to <br />enable the evaluation of design information for public and private <br />improvements including proposed retaining walls. <br />Commentary: Soil survey information was submitted with final plat documents <br />and City Engineer feels submittals are adequate to evaluate project. <br />• 1005.020 (d) 4. <br />Tree coverage survey has not been submitted. <br />Commentary: Tree coverage survey was submitted with final plat documents <br />(See attachment A3). <br />■ 1005.020 (d) 10. A plan for soil erosion and sediment control both <br />during construction and after development has not been completed as <br />evidenced by the letter dated July 17, 2003 from the Ramsey/Washington <br />Metro Watershed District. <br />Commentary: The plan for soil and erosion control was submitted via notes on <br />the grading plan dated 9/15/05. The City Engineer has made recommendations <br />relative to this submittal in his report to follow. <br />• 1005.020 (d) 11. A vegetation preservation and protection plan has not <br />been submitted. <br />Commentary: A vegetative preservation and protection a plan was submitted via <br />notes on the grading plan dated 9/15/05. <br />■ 1005.020 (d) 12. A financial statement of the developer satisfactory to <br />the City has not been submitted. <br />Commentary: Staff did not require the developer to submit financial statements. <br />Rather, staff is relying on the fact that a development agreement will be required <br />prior to the commencement of any construction and after all outstanding issues <br />have been resolved with financial surety equal to 125% of the estimated cost of the <br />required improvements - 1008.010 (b). <br />• 1005.020 (c) <br />the final plat. <br />Location of monuments are not shown and described on <br />Commentary: The location of monuments is still not shown on the final plat. <br />Monuments were depicted on the grading plan. Developer will need to correct <br />this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.