My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-24-2005 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
08-24-2005 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2014 2:09:04 PM
Creation date
4/24/2012 11:02:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />AUGUST 11, 2005 <br />outlot, therefore the island would be part of the right -of -way. However, <br />homeowners documents could be drafted that would give the maintenance <br />responsibility for the island area as well as the property along the railroad <br />tracks to the homeowners association. <br />Barraclough indicated that he liked the concept before the Commission <br />this evening and felt it was a vast improvement from the R -2 concept <br />presented a year ago. He felt the layout make sense given the proximity of <br />the railroad tracks. <br />Fritz Bredenbeck, County Road C, indicated that his property is adjacent <br />to this proposal and asked the impact on grade changes and ponding on his <br />property. <br />Freeman indicated that grading and ponding will not negatively impact <br />adjacent properties. He pointed out that the R -1 development as proposed <br />works with the existing topography of the property and minimal grading <br />will need to be done. He also indicated that the development was <br />designed in order to save virtually all the trees on the site. <br />Duray asked the value of the homes that would be constructed on this site. <br />Freeman indicated that the developer may sell the lots to a builder, and he <br />was not sure as to the value of homes that would be built. <br />Knudsen indicated that he supports the concept proposed and felt the <br />development would be an asset to the City. Duray agrees and felt the <br />proposal fits the property well. Duray asked the Planner for his reaction to <br />the cul -de -sac as proposed. <br />The City Planner indicated that Little Canada has no cul -de -sacs with <br />planted islands (Note: there is one on Dianne Lane). He indicated, <br />however, that other communities in which he works has such islands and <br />they are attractive and work well. The Planner indicated that the Public <br />Works Department should comment on the proposed design. <br />Freeman also pointed out that the cul -de -sac island is helpful to Public <br />Works as a place for snow storage during the winter months. <br />Wojcik reported that the supported the concept proposed, but noted that he <br />has enjoyed looking at the vacant green area over the past few years. <br />Socha supported the concept, but indicated that the grading of the site <br />should not impact surrounding properties. The Planner noted that this is a <br />concept review at this point. If the project moved to the platting stage, the <br />City Engineer will review detailed grading and drainage plans for the site. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.