Laserfiche WebLink
29GY6 `CJtniCLGCa <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 551171600 <br />(651) 766 -4029 / FAY: (651) 766-4048 <br />www. ci. little- canada. mn. us <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor Fahey & Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />DATE: May 7, 2004 <br />RE: Implementation of Business Revolving Loan Fund Program <br />MAYOR <br />Michael L Fahey <br />COUNCIL <br />Jim LaValle <br />Matt Anderson <br />Rick Montour <br />Bill Blesener <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel R. Hanson <br />Attached are the revised documents for the Business Revolving Loan Fund (BRLF). I have made the changes <br />requested by US Banlc. They are indicated with underlining /strike through on all documents except the <br />participation agreement. This document was dramatically different and I have used the format they will approve. <br />Loan targeting was another issue you wanted a recommendation on. In thinking about this further, my main <br />concern is do we want to try to avoid lending money to properties that we think are candidates for redevelopment'? <br />The best example of this concern would involve Ultimate Golf, Tierney's Liquors, and Lincoln Pawn based on <br />our earlier redevelopment objectives. Presently, there are no plans to redevelop these properties. If we believe <br />that won't change, then I do not believe they should be disqualified from eligibility. If you feel otherwise, we <br />should discuss this issue. <br />If we want to target specific properties, I would recommend both Round Lake and Thunder Bay shopping centers. <br />I would also target the Market Place Shopping Center's pylon sign. If we believe Ultimate Golf, Tierney's, and <br />Lincoln Pawn will not be redeveloped, then I would include them as well. As you can tell, I am basically <br />targeting those properties in the redevelopment area. Othenvise, any business that meets the criteria should be <br />allowed to participate, as I believe there are a number of them who could benefit from this program. <br />The level of funding is another item we need to make a decision on. We have $150,000 available. At the last <br />meeting, it was suggested we start slow. Based on that comment, I would recommend we allocate $75,000 to kick <br />off the program. It should also be noted that I have confirmed with Mary Ippei of Briggs & Morgan that the <br />development fee paid by Presbyterian Homes for the Mayfield is ours to do with as we please. (The initial fee <br />was a deposit set aside to offset our costs for the LGA/HACA penalty we were to face as part of the TIF program. <br />However, the legislature eliminated this provision as part of property tax reform. <br />I would recommend approval of the program guidelines as revised. <br />