Laserfiche WebLink
Twin Lake Survey Results <br />1, M <br />Result <br />48% were in favor of Little Canada <br />water at higher cost if the system was <br />not looped intially. <br />48% were in favor of Little Canada <br />water deferral options. <br />If the system was looped initially the <br />respondents were split 50/50 on Little <br />Canada vs. Vadnais Heights water. <br />Neither <br />In <br />1.0 <br />in <br />Vadnais <br />Heights <br />M <br />Little <br />Canada <br />U) <br />to <br />CO <br />3. With the updated information regarding Vadnais Heights' <br />water quality versus the additional costs ($1,900 to $2,850 in <br />addition to the initial costs of $5,600), which source of water <br />would you be willing to pay for if the Vadnais Option were <br />initially constructed as a dead -end line? <br />4. If the City would provide some form of assessment <br />deferral until the looped system was completed or until you <br />chose to connect to the water system, whichever is earlier, <br />which source of water would you be willing to pay for? (Note: <br />The deferred amount would increase by inflation over the <br />estimates provided in this packet.) <br />5. Based on the information in Question 3, which source <br />would you be willing to pay for if the Vadnais option was a <br />looped system? (There would be no deferral of assessments <br />in this case.) <br />-19- <br />