My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-26-2004 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
05-26-2004 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2012 3:23:19 PM
Creation date
5/1/2012 3:11:28 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 26, 2003 <br />3165/3167 <br />SPRUCE <br />STREET — <br />VALOR <br />information. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2003-11-270 — T 113LING .ACTION ON THE <br />AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE <br />FOR 3165 -3167 SPRUCE STREET, VALOR ENTERPRISES, <br />PENDING A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING <br />COMMISSION. <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, LaValle, Fahey, Montour, Anderson. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />AMENDMENT Mayor Fahey opened the public hearing to consider an amendment to <br />TO ZONING to the Zoning Code relative to accessory and principal buildings. Fahey <br />CODE — noted that the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the <br />ACCESSORY amendment. <br />& PRINCIPAL <br />BUILDINGS There was no one from the general public present wishing to comment on <br />this matter. <br />Upon motion by Fahey, seconded by Anderson, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />The City Planner indicated that the proposed amendment clarifies the <br />definitions of accessory use /building and principal use building as well as <br />establishes single - family dwelling performance requirements. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -11 -271 — AMENDING SECTION 902 OF <br />THE LITTLE CANADA CITY CODE ADDRESSING ACCESSORY <br />USE /BUILDING AND PRINCIPAL USE /BUILDING DEFINITIONS <br />AND ESTABLISHING SINGLE -FAMIL Y DWELLING <br />PERFORIVLANCE REQUIREMENTS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Montour, Anderson, Blesener, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Anderson noted the moratorium that is in place relative to this matter. The <br />City Attorney noted that the moratorium ordinance contained an <br />expiration date and recommended that it be allowed to expire on its own. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.