Laserfiche WebLink
It is also noted that due to the configuration of the property, it would not be possible to <br />construct a public street on the property and subdivide into standard single family lots. <br />To develop the property, a private street would be necessary. <br />One option to the R -2 design would be a single family PUD served by a private street. <br />A typical single family subdivision in Little Canada would have an average density of 2.0 <br />to 2.5 units per acre, resulting in a unit count on this parcel of 5 to 6 units. An <br />alternative design that decreases the detached unit count to this range would be <br />consistent with the current zoning. A second option would be to provide for 5 or 6 units, <br />but allow them to be attached. This design would be able to conserve open space on <br />the site. <br />2. Site Planning. If the City believes that the 11 unit density is appropriate, the site <br />plan would be the next issue to address. The proposed plan relies on a private street <br />that would run north from Old County Road C, with each unit having a driveway off of <br />the central spine. The plan provides for nine units along the east side of the street, with <br />two additional units on the west side where the property is slightly wider. A small pond <br />is shown along County Road C to the north. <br />The unit plans are two - bedroom rambler units with basement space. Each unit has a <br />small two -car garage. The units are approximately 1,450 square feet on the main level. <br />A deck is shown on the unit plans, and the basements may accommodate walk -out <br />access, depending on grading. <br />The plan is simple, given the configuration and size of the property. The only apparent <br />way to alter the design in any significant way would be to reduce the number of units, or <br />attach units into larger buildings, creating more open space. <br />Summary and Recommendation <br />At concept level, the City does not typically offer a specific approval or denial. Instead, <br />the opportunity for comment and feedback to the developer is intended to help the <br />applicant decide whether to proceed with a project, or alter it and return with more <br />detailed plans. <br />Planning staff believes that attached housing on this site could be appropriate, however, <br />a density of about 6 units would be consistent with the single family neighborhoods in <br />the area. A PUD design that preserves a significant amount of open space could be <br />attractive on this site, and provide for the ability to utilize a private street for site acess. <br />pc: Kathy Glanzer <br />Steve Westerhaus <br />Lee Elfering <br />Greg Schroeder <br />James Construction, PO Box 576, North Branch, MN 55056 <br />