Laserfiche WebLink
Gervais Lake Association, March 31, 2004 Page 2 <br />The current plans for the West Vadnais Lake Outlet are for a roughly 2,000 foot -long pipe to <br />terminate at a 1.5 acre pond behind the Levitz Furniture building. This pond would be considerably <br />larger than the current pond and would be 3 to 4 feet deep. Hydrologic modeling has indicated that <br />the outlet velocities from this pond would be considerably less than currently exists. <br />One of the other conditions of the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District in considering <br />this proposal is that we would have control of the pipeline and would be allowed to block flows into <br />the pipeline, should downstream flooding conditions warrant. We would work out an operations <br />procedure for this closure. This procedure would be available for review and comment. It is our <br />intention that the pipeline would be blocked during periods of high water, so additional flows from <br />West Vadnais do not contribute to, or exacerbate, an existing problem. <br />It should be clearly understood that high water in West Vadnais is not a result of one sto ni, or a <br />short-term series of storms. The level of West Vadnais currently is high due to an almost decade - <br />long, higher- than - normal precipitation period. It is theorized that the level of West Vadnais is more <br />influenced by regional groundwater levels than precipitation levels. Flooding conditions in Gervais <br />Lake and the Phalen chain of lakes is influenced largely by an extremely high spring snowmelt <br />event and big summer storm events. West Vadnais would not respond as quickly as does the <br />Phalen chain of lakes. We will consider the elevation noted in your letter as a trigger for <br />sandbagging the outlet; however, your elevation of 860.0 can be achieved with one summer rainfall <br />event. I think the elevation of 860.0 would be a good trigger for inspection of the outlet to <br />determine if discharge volumes are significant enough to warrant shutting off flow. We will draft <br />this operations procedure and provide it to the lake association for review. <br />2. Possible new waters entering from I -35E / I -694 Unweave the Weave Project <br />I am not sure if your figure of more - than - double hard surface area is correct, but there will indeed <br />be a considerably larger amount of hard surface with the new project than the existing freeway <br />configuration. However, MnDOT is providing numerous ponds within the Unweave the Weave <br />Project to maintain flows at or below current discharge rates. There will also be considerable <br />improvement in water quality exiting from the freeway system compared to existing conditions. <br />Due to the increase in impervious surface, the total annual volume of water discharging from the <br />freeway system will be larger; however, the rate of runoff which contributes to flood levels will <br />remain at, or be lower than, current levels. Therefore, this system will not increase flood levels in <br />the chain of lakes. The Unweave the Weave Project design has been incorporated into the <br />District's hydrologic modeling for the chain of lakes watershed. This information was recently <br />incorporated, double- checked, and used to verify that flood levels will not be increasing. <br />Your concern for waters from Twin Lake and other areas of Vadnais Heights is a good question; <br />however, there are no new drainage areas contributing to the watershed. No new areas will be <br />connected that are not currently connected to the drainage system. The Twin Lake drainage area is <br />currently landlocked and does not outlet, and it has not outletted for a considerable period of time. <br />The drainage system will be improved in the Unweave the Weave Project but we still do not <br />anticipate any outlet volume coming from Twin Lake. <br />3. Possible new waters from the next phase of the I -694 reconstruction <br />I have not seen any plans for the reconstruction of I -694 between Rice Street and I-35W but this <br />reach of I -694 is outside of our drainage area and would not contribute additional flows to Ramsey - <br />Washington Metro Watershed District. <br />-19- <br />