My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-2004 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
07-28-2004 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2012 11:03:42 AM
Creation date
5/4/2012 10:56:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JULY 8, 2004 <br />Loeffler requested that the Commission table action on this matter for <br />another 30 days to allow the property owner an opportunity to sit down <br />with staff and work out some options. <br />Groholski asked what the Commission's understanding was relative to the <br />fence, questioning whether or not the fence was being requested by the St. <br />Paul Water Department. The Planner indicated that Mr. Groholski <br />proposed the fence due to his concern about people crossing his property. <br />The City Planner recommended that the Planning Commission take action <br />on the Precision Tree request for Variance and Amendment to CUP <br />pointing out that these issues have been tabled a number of times, and the <br />general public has been waiting for an outcome. <br />Groholski pointed out that the alternative heat source would not be used <br />for the next couple of months, therefore, suggested there was time to table <br />the matter for further study. Loeffler agreed and suggested that Precision <br />Tree would come in with an alternative proposal during the August <br />planning cycle. <br />Keis felt that the outdoor storage limitations under the Code and the <br />amount of outdoor storage proposed by Precision Tree were so tar apart <br />that an acceptable alternative was unlikely. Duray agreed. Duray stated <br />that he appreciates the business community of Little Canada, but noted <br />that the City must apply its codes evenly. The amount of outdoor storage <br />being requested was too large of a discrepancy from what is allowed under <br />the Code. It was also noted that the alternative heat source is a nuisance to <br />the neighborhood and must be addressed. <br />Keis recommended denial of the Variance to allow outdoor storage in <br />excess of Code limitations given there is no hardship present to warrant <br />granting the variance, and recommended approval of the Amendment to <br />Conditional Use Permit to modify the site plant to reflect the addition of <br />Eifel tanks only, and recommended denial of the Amendment to CUP for <br />all other additional outdoor storage items including the accessory structure <br />for wood - burning heating system, and instructing Precision Tree to return <br />the site to compliance with the approved site plan within 90 days. <br />Motion seconded by Wojcik. <br />Motion carried 5 — 0. <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.