Laserfiche WebLink
cee j Y4 i1 a/yL a' <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 551174600 <br />(651) 766 -4020 / FAX: (651) 766 -4048 <br />www.cilittle- canada.mn.us <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor Fahey and Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />Shelly Rueckert, Accounting Supervisor <br />DATE: November 19, 2004 <br />RE: 2005 Levy <br />iV[AYOR <br />Michael 1. Fahey <br />COUNCIL <br />Jim LaVatle <br />Matt Anderson <br />Rick Montour <br />Bill Dlesener <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel R. Hanson <br />As you know, the 2005 proposed levy is currently $1,864,775. This represents a 1.65% <br />increase over 2004. If the Fire Relief Association contribution remains at $15,000, the <br />levy would stand at $1,849,391 or .82% increase over 2004. To attain a 0% levy <br />increase for 2005, we would need to cut expenses or raise revenues by some combination <br />totaling $29,590. <br />With the 2005 TNT hearing coming up on Monday, December 6`I', staff would like the <br />City Council to establish the levy to be used for presentation purposes. I have attached <br />the TNT slides we will be using for the City's tax calculation. To assist in evaluating the <br />impact of a reduction from the current levy to a zero percent net levy, we have prepared <br />slides showing a 0% value increase at the two tax rates. You will note that a zero percent <br />net levy saves the owner of a $250,000 home $9.68. The owner of a $375,000 home <br />would save $14.51. <br />It is important to remember that a zero percent valuation increase on a residential <br />property is extremely unlikely given valuation increases and more importantly, due to the <br />phase out of limited market value. This phase out continues the implementation of the <br />shift in tax burden to single family residential from other classes of property. (See <br />attached article from the Star Tribune.) With the phasing out of limited market values, <br />many properties in the City will see valuation increases in the 15% to 25% range. Even <br />with a negative levy it would be difficult to avoid tax increases in these situations. <br />It should also be noted that to obtain our current levy, the Infrastructure Fund levy was <br />reduced by $31,642. Without that reduction the levy would currently be $1,897,229, <br />