My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-2004 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
11-24-2004 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2014 9:08:55 AM
Creation date
5/8/2012 2:50:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MIN UTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />NOVEMBER 16, 2004 <br />amount of signage and that the signage be such that is mounted on the <br />building. <br />Nickleson indicated that he is trying to recognize the nostalgia and history <br />of A & W through this signage proposal. <br />The City Planner indicated that a certain amount of window signage is <br />exempted from the Code. Therefore, the neon window signs would be <br />acceptable. <br />Knudsen suggested that Mr. Nickleson develop a signage plan for the <br />property that is in compliance with the Code. The City Planner reported <br />that the height and width of the two street frontages as well as the square <br />footage of the building would be needed to calculate the amount of square <br />footage of signage allowed under the ordinance. The Planner further <br />noted that the Code allows for a total of three signs for this property, that <br />being two wall signs and one pylon sign. <br />Keis suggested that rather than deny the Variance tonight, that Mr. <br />Nickleson meet with the City Planner to determine the actual amount of <br />signage allowed. Keis suggested that this matter be tabled until the <br />December meeting. <br />Nickleson indicated that his intent is to update the property to ensure that <br />his customers have a good experience. Nickleson indicated that the <br />signage plan submitted was suggested by the A & W corporate office. <br />Knudsen indicated that the City has many corporate businesses, and if it <br />allowed signage as proposed by the corporate office, it would end up with <br />"a clog's breakfast ". Knudsen suggested that there may be a creative way <br />to accomplish what Nickleson is seeking while complying with the City's <br />Codes. <br />Knudsen recommended tabling the Variance to exceed the number of wall <br />signs allowed as well as Architectural Review of the proposed signage for <br />A & W at 3006 Rice Street until the December 9, 2004 Planning <br />Commission meeting. <br />Motion seconded by Wojcik. <br />Motion carried 5 — 0. <br />_4_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.