My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
11-13-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 2:23:08 PM
Creation date
5/11/2012 2:52:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IMPROVING FISCAL FUTURES <br />2 <br />3 FF -1. State -Local Fiscal Relations (GC) <br />4 <br />5 Since the 1970s, services provided by Minnesota cities have been largely funded through <br />6 a combination of property taxes, state aids, and state property tax relief programs. This system of <br />7 municipal finance has evolved to ensure that municipal services can be funded without excessive <br />8 local tax burdens, <br />9 <br />10 In 2001, the Legislature enacted significant changes to the property tax system. With <br />11 those changes, the state increased its funding participation for schools while city operations <br />12 received less funding. On average, cities are now more reliant on property taxes to fund their <br />13 operations, although some cities are now more reliant on state aid. The changes to the state aid <br />14 distribution were necessary to more evenly distribute tax relief across the state. <br />15 <br />16 With the budget crisis that now confronts the state, further review by the Legislature and <br />17 possible changes to the municipal finance system appear likely. This could ultimately translate <br />18 into further reductions in state aid to cities and, therefore, a further increased reliance on property <br />19 taxes to fund city operations. <br />20 <br />21 Any changes to the state -local fiscal system should meet the following goals: <br />Reduce tax burden disparities among communities and between cities and adjacent <br />24 townships. <br />25 ® Compensate cities and their taxpayers for overburden and tax exempt property. <br />26 • Compensate for state - imposed mandates. <br />27 ® Provide sufficient funding to address these principles. <br />28 ® Respect the decision - malting authority of local officials. <br />29 <br />30 FF -2. LGA Data Issues (GC) <br />31 <br />32 Issue: The release of 2000 Census data has highlighted a problem with one of the <br />33 variables used in the local government aid (LGA) distribution formula. The pre -1940 housing <br />34 percentage statistic used as one proxy measure of each city's need is derived from sample data <br />35 collected in the "long- form" survey. For individual cities, this statistic appears to significantly <br />36 fluctuate and may not accurately estimate the actual age of housing. <br />37 <br />38 Response: The Legislature should identify a replacement source for data to measure <br />39 the amount of housing. The formula should continue to use the 1990 Census data until a <br />40 more accurate replacement data set can be identified. <br />41 <br />42 FF -3. LGA and Market -Value Homestead Credit Cuts (GC) <br />Issue: City reliance on state aids and funding for property tax relief programs means that <br />45 the state's budget deficit could become a local budget problem if funding for these programs is <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.