My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
11-13-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 2:23:08 PM
Creation date
5/11/2012 2:52:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
with less than six weeks notice. The increase had no apparent relationship to the cost of <br />2 providing the service. <br />3 <br />4 Response: State agencies should be required to demonstrate the need for increases in <br />5 service fees, and should give adequate notice of increases to allow local governments to <br />6 budget for the increases. State agencies should set administrative service fees as close as <br />7 possible to the marginal cost of providing the service. Local government should be given <br />8 the option to self - administer or contract with the private sector for the service if the state <br />9 cannot provide the service at a reasonable cost. <br />10 <br />11 FF 21. Equity in Library Funding (GC) <br />12 <br />13 Issue: Many community libraries in Minnesota are city owned. Although located in an <br />14 individual community, city libraries serve a much wider area. <br />15 <br />16 Response: The League supports equity in availability of quality library services to <br />17 city and township residents. Accordingly, the League supports equity in local property tax <br />18 levies for libraries. In some Minnesota counties, there are wide disparities between city and <br />19 rural tax burdens for library services. There should be more equity in the property tax. <br />20 <br />21 IMPROVING LOCAL ECONOMIES <br />LE -1. Growth Management and Annexation (RS) <br />24 <br />25 Issue: Unplanned and uncontrolled urban growth has a negative environmental, fiscal, <br />26 and governmental impact on cities, counties, and state governments because it increases the cost <br />27 of providing government services and results in the loss of natural resource areas and prime <br />28 agricultural land. <br />29 <br />30 Response: The League believes the existing framework for guiding growth and <br />31 development primarily through local plans and controls adopted by local governments <br />32 should form the basis of a statewide planning policy, and that the state should not adopt a <br />33 mandatory comprehensive statewide planning process. Rather, the state should: <br />34 <br />35 ® Provide additional financial and technical assistance to local governments for <br />36 cooperative planning and growth management issues, particularly where new <br />37 comprehensive plans have been mandated by the Legislature. <br />38 • Clearly establish the public purposes served by existing statewide controls such as shore <br />39 land zoning and wetlands conservation; clarify, simplify, and streamline these controls; <br />40 eliminate duplication in their administration; and fully defend and hold harmless any <br />41 local government sued for a "taking" as a result of executing state land use policies. <br />42 • Give cities broader authority to extend their zoning, subdivision, and other land -use <br />controls up to two miles outside the city's boundaries, regardless of the existence of <br />county or township controls, to ensure conformance with city facilities and services. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.