My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
11-13-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 2:23:08 PM
Creation date
5/11/2012 2:52:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 • Oppose measures that would mandate that cities provide sufficient regulatory relief to <br />2 ensure that a specific percentage of units in new housing developments are affordable at <br />3 particular income pricing without direct subsidy or cross - subsidies or that cities must <br />4 adopt accessory dwelling unit ordinances. <br />5 • Refrain from restricting, eliminating, or proscribing local authority to adopt and carry <br />6 out land use plans, activities, and regulations. <br />7 <br />8 LE -9. Community Land Trusts (AH) <br />9 <br />10 Issue: The steeply increasing price of land available for housing development <br />11 is a growing concern throughout the state. Action is needed to create more permanently <br />12 affordable owner- occupied housing by maximizing the cost - effectiveness of taxpayer <br />13 investments. MHFA had one -time authority to assist cities to fund the establishment of <br />14 community land trusts for affordable housing. <br />15 <br />16 Response: The 2002 Legislature should support a land trust capacity - building <br />17 program and provide capital start -up funds so that community land trusts can offer gap <br />18 financing, interest -rate write- downs, predevelopment financing, and financial underwriting <br />19 costs. <br />20 <br />21 LE -l0. Municipal Telecommunications Authority (AH) <br />22 <br />23 Issue: Cities must have the authority and the tools to put in place the necessary <br />24 infrastructure, educational resources, applications, and skill -sets to become connected <br />25 communities. Several court decisions demonstrate that provisions of the 1996 federal <br />26 Telecommunications Act requiring removal of barriers to entry for "any entity" apply directly to <br />27 cities' interest in gaining clear authority to create municipal telecommunications utilities in order <br />28 to provide advanced services at the local level. <br />29 <br />30 Response: The Legislature and state agencies must act to make it possible for cities <br />31 to provide affordable access to advanced telecommunications and information services by: <br />32 <br />33 • Allowing a city to become a telecommunications and information service provider upon <br />34 approval of the city council and to extend services beyond city cooperate boundaries <br />35 upon authorization of the Municipal Public Utilities Commission. <br />36 • Defining a strategic leadership role for cities by eliminating barriers to municipal entry. <br />37 • Supporting efforts by cities to bring advanced services to local residents and businesses, <br />38 and to encourage collaboration among communities and institutions to expand <br />39 education, health care, and economic opportunities at the Local and regional level. <br />40 • Allowing cities and municipal utilities to join with other entities, such as cooperative <br />41 associations, investor -owned utilities, or other municipal utilities or power agencies, to <br />42 provide telecommunications and information service. <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.