My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
11-13-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 2:23:08 PM
Creation date
5/11/2012 2:52:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 Response: The private sector must be required to pay a greater share of the <br />improvements that benefit their industry. The public sector should not be expected to <br />3 underwrite the costs of improvements sought by the private sector. The state and federal <br />4 government must participate in adequately funding the mitigation of the negative impact of <br />5 railroads on local government and its citizens. The federal government must exercise <br />6 greater over -sight of the STB to ensure fair and equitable solutions are reached when <br />7 dealing with cities in Minnesota. <br />8 <br />9 IMPROVING SERVICE DELIVERY <br />10 <br />11 SD -1. Redesigning and Reinventing Government (GC) <br />12 <br />13 Issue: Every level of government is re- evaluating, reprioritizing, redesigning, and <br />14 renewing its organizational structure and programs in response to financial realities and citizens' <br />15 needs and problems. Reforms, however, must be more than change for the sake of change or a <br />16 reshuffling of existing programs to appease the electorate. To be meaningful, reorganization and <br />17 reassignments of governmental entities and services should save money where feasible, deliver <br />18 improved services, serve essential needs, and be equitably structured. Cities have and will <br />19 continue to pursue the use of cooperative agreements, the re- evaluation of city programs and <br />20 services, and changes to organizational structures. <br />21 <br />22 Response: The federal, state, and county governments should: <br />24 • Ensure that in redesigning, reinventing or reassigning government services and <br />25 programs that the appropriate level of service to citizens is evaluated and citizen <br />26 demands and expectations are adequately addressed. <br />27 • Promote local efforts through incentives, rather than mandates. <br />28 • Communicate and establish a process of negotiation before shifting responsibility for <br />29 delivering services from one level of government to another or seeking to reduce service <br />30 duplication. <br />31 • Transfer authority for use of revenues dedicated to such programs, or provide <br />32 appropriate and adequate alternatives. <br />33 • Identify and repeal programs or discontinue services that are no longer necessary or <br />34 which can readily and fairly be provided by the private sector. <br />35 • Employ existing government entities in redesign efforts rather than create new agencies <br />36 or units. <br />37 <br />38 SD -2. Unfunded Mandates (GC) <br />39 <br />1'0 Issue: The cost of federal and state mandated programs substitute the judgment of <br />41 Congress, the president, the Legislature, and the governor for local budget priorities. These <br />42 mandates force cities to reduce funding for other basic services or to increase taxes and service <br />charges. The passage by the Legislature of reporting requirements for new state mandates, and <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.