My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
11-13-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 2:23:08 PM
Creation date
5/11/2012 2:52:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the city of Chanhassen in 1995 to experiment using this process for purchasing playground <br />equipment. <br />4 Response: The Legislature should authorize an extension of the design -build <br />5 procedure to cities as a less expensive alternative to the standard bid procedure. <br />6 <br />7 SD -5, Providing Information to Citizens (ABH) <br />8 <br />9 Issue: To keep the public updated and informed, state law requires local units of <br />10 government to publish various notification documents in newspapers, and often dictates which <br />11 newspapers receive cities' publication business. The number and variety of documents required <br />12 to be published and the costs of publication are burdensome. Technological advancements have <br />13 expanded the ways government can provide information to citizens. In many cases, these new <br />14 technologies are more efficient and cost effective. <br />15 <br />16 Response: Cities should be authorized to take advantage of new technologies to <br />17 increase the dissemination of information to citizens and potentially lower the associated <br />18 costs. Specifically, the Legislature should authorize local units of government to designate <br />19 an appropriate daily /weekly publication; elect alternative means of communication such as <br />20 city newsletters, cable television, and the Internet; and expand the use of summaries where <br />21 information is technical or lengthy. Additionally, the Legislature should eliminate outdated <br />22 or unnecessary publication requirements. <br />SD -6. Construction Codes (RS) <br />25 <br />26 Issue: Each year the Legislature addresses construction codes issues that have some <br />27 impact on local governments. In addition, the Construction Codes Advisory Council and <br />28 Builders' Association of Minnesota have indicated they may be recommending legislation to <br />29 require statewide enforcement of the building code. <br />30 <br />31 While all cities must enforce certain codes- -such as the accessibility code, the electrical <br />32 code and the bleacher safety code - -the state's building code remains a local option for cities <br />33 outside the metropolitan area. Many greater Minnesota cities have adopted the state building <br />34 code and all cities within the seven - county metropolitan area are required to adhere to the state <br />35 building code. <br />36 <br />37 Response: A building code provides many benefits, including uniformity of <br />38 construction standards in the building industry, consistency in code interpretation and <br />39 enforcement, and life - safety guidance. <br />40 <br />41 A statewide - enforced building code may have benefits, but requiring it would result <br />42 in an unfunded mandate. The enforcement of a building code can be cost prohibitive for <br />43 many cities due to the expenses and overhead related to staffing vs. the limited building <br />4.1 activity occurring in some communities. <br />-, r, The League supports adoption of a state building code so long as there is not <br />47 mandatory enforcement at the local level. The adoption of an enforced state building code <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.