My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-28-2002 Additions
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
08-28-2002 Additions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2012 9:55:07 AM
Creation date
5/14/2012 9:53:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ripciuie ouiciy 1cbuuiiuiiy uy ociiawi ivi trruy <br />one -time event. <br />If you live near a pipeline, you should have a right to know the possible hazards, to <br />know when there are problems or changes, and to know the results of any tests. - <br />more- The victims of the Bellingham tragedy might still be with us today if their <br />parents had been informed about the pipeline's dangerous potential to rupture. <br />Pipeline companies should have an on -going process of informing the public when <br />things aren't working correctly and when changes are made to a pipeline. <br />The second thing we need to do is make sure that the people who operate and test <br />pipelines have the highest training and certification. That means we need to establish <br />minimum federal standards of competency, and we need to enforce them. We should <br />train operators and inspectors more thoroughly We should test them periodically. <br />And they should be certified by the government. We -- as lawmakers -- have a public <br />duty to establish minimum federal standard to protect our constituents. <br />Mr. Chairman, we also need better testing and monitoring procedures. Too many of <br />the current tests are not reliable. We need new, high -tech ways to make sure pipelines <br />are safe. That means investing in the research and development, which will allow us <br />to better detect pipe corrosion -- both internally and externally. We must also work <br />to make forms of internal detection more reliable and accurate. <br />One of the biggest causes of pipeline leaks is "third party" damage. This usually <br />occurs when there is construction or other disruptions on or near a pipeline. We <br />should invest in the technology that will tell us when these activities damage a <br />pipeline. <br />I hope we can help prevent "third party" damage by promoting "one -call" centers -- <br />places people can call to find out where pipelines are and what type of activities can <br />damage them. Statistics show that many excavators and builders don't call for <br />pipeline information before digging or building. <br />While "one -call" centers have not worked as well as many people expected, I think <br />they can be an important part of our overall efforts. We should work to improve and <br />finance "one -call" centers. <br />And we must do more. We need to set federal standards for leak detection. We need <br />to lower the threshold for reporting spills. We need to establish more periodic federal <br />testing and inspection of pipelines. We need to finalize appropriate standards for <br />pipelines in highly populated and environmentally sensitive areas. And we need to <br />address the problem of aging pipelines. <br />Senator Gorton and I sit on the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on <br />Transportation. I promise to do all I can to fight for increased funding for the Office <br />of Pipeline Safety -- so it can achieve the objectives we require it to meet. <br />Mr. Chairman, before I close let me just add, that I read in this morning's Seattle Post <br />Intelligencer that the Department plans to conduct a comprehensive review and <br />inspection of all underground pipelines within Washington state. <br />http: / /murray. senate .gov /pipelinetestimony.html 8/22/02 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.