My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
09-25-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2012 11:30:10 AM
Creation date
5/14/2012 11:21:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
vai V4 LLt 10: U4 1LL 6517390846 PROTERRA_-DESSIGN <br />Whams <br />WILLIAMS ENERGY SERVICES <br />INTER- OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE <br />)ATE: September 3, 2002 <br />O: Don Jensen <br />rR0M: Andrew Livingston <br />WBJECT: 280:M068 The Preserve <br />Tract 3318 <br />Ramsey County, Minnesota <br />4FE: 280- 2002 -08978 <br />k reviewer the drawings submitted by Pro Cerra Design Associates, Inc. showing WPL fit-6", 42 -6 ", 84 -12" lines <br />:tossing the subject developtnent has been completed. In particular, the drawings titled "The Preserve Little <br />Canada, Minnesota ", Drawing No's: C2.1, C3.1 C4.1, LI „Land Metro Land Surveying and Engineering Drawings <br />'Topo and Boundary" and "Preliminary Plat' as well as Williams Pipeline Company (WPL) - Alignment Drawing <br />No's. DMA - 043 -49, and DMA- 043 -49D were evaluated. It was determined -that the NI-6" line in this area belongs <br />to MCI -World Com. The discussions to follow will therefore he limited to the remaining 42 -6" and 44 -12" lines, <br />•Please note: All pipeline engineering station numbers (ESN) stated below pertain to the H4-12" ESN and are <br />scaled from the drawings.' <br />The first area of concern is the proposed Preserve Court road within our pipeline Right of Way and running <br />parallel to our pipelines from pipeline ESN 13479 +02 to ESN 13474 +48. The distance from the edge of pavement <br />to our4 -12 ", which is the closest pipeline to it, varies from 18 feet to 31 feet. Due to the separation between the <br />road and our pipeline and the depth of our line (approximately 3 feet), our line will be out ofthc zone of any <br />additional stress resulting from the road construction. <br />The second area of concern is the proposed Preserve Trail road crossing the pipelines at our pipeline ESN <br />13470 +00. The proposed depth of cover at the crossing is 4 feet. Analyzing the induced stress due to external loads <br />using.Pisces.it was determined that the proposed road passes all the criteria of API 1102 and is satisfactory. <br />Furthermore; the depth of cover noted above meets WPL minimum requirement as stated in our Encroachment <br />• <br />Guidelines::" <br />The third area of concern is the distance between the pipeline and the proposed dwelling at Block 2, Lot I. The <br />proposed distance is approximately 26 feet from the tt4 -12 "pipeline. D.O-T Part 195 Paragraph 210 specifics a <br />minimum distance of 50 feet between a pipeline and dwelling or a minimum cover of 48 inches if the distance <br />cannot be obtained. Our easement at this point extends to the north property line of tract 3318B approximately 16 <br />feet north of the tt 4 -12 ". While we have no control overthis area since it is outside of our right of way easement it <br />is highly recommended that the placement of the dwelling on this lot be oriented to provide the maximum <br />separation. between it and our pipeline. <br />The final area of concern is the landscaping over the pipeline right of way. WPL Encroachment Guidelines state <br />that no trees orshrubs 3 feet or taller at maturity arc permitted on our right -of -way- This would include the area on <br />the south side of the entrance road to Road ESN 5 +65 and the road crossing at P eserve Trail within the limits of <br />002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.