My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-09-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
07-09-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 2:11:04 PM
Creation date
5/14/2012 1:43:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 24, 2002 <br />RECESS <br />AMENDMENT <br />TO B -W ZONING <br />DISTRICT <br />At this point in the meeting, 8:50 p.m., the Council took a short recess. The <br />meeting was reconvened at 9:00 p.m. <br />Fahey opened the continued public hearing to consider an Amendment to <br />the Zoning Code relative to the Business - Warehouse (B -W) Zoning <br />District. It was noted that the Planning Commission has recommended <br />approval of the amendment as submitted. <br />The City Planner reviewed his April 24, 2002 report relative to the Drywall <br />Supply proposal for use of the Knox site. The Planner noted that if the B -W <br />District is amended as proposed, the Drywall Supply use could be a legal user <br />of the site if the outdoor storage is eliminated. The Planner noted that the <br />Drywall Supply use would not be considered a continuation of the Knox use, <br />but a different use completely. <br />The City Administrator indicated that given the soil conditions of the property, <br />it may not be financially feasible to redevelop the site. However, it may be <br />possible to utilize TIF funds to offset the costs of soil corrections. <br />Scalze pointed out that no soil information has been presented for the southern <br />portion of the site. Anderson agreed, but pointed out that information has been <br />presented showing that soils get worse the further south you move on the site. <br />Fahey agreed that the back soils are the most questionable on the site. <br />Fahey asked if the City adopted the B -W Zoning Amendment, if Carl <br />Johnson's multi- faceted development proposal that consists of two higher - <br />valued buildings on the front of the site and the Drywall Supply building on <br />the back would be permitted. The City Planner pointed out that the property <br />would have to be subdivided and the proposal as submitted would be permitted <br />except for the outdoor storage. The City Planner noted that the Drywall <br />Supply proposal with the outdoor storage as proposed would only meet the <br />requirements of the I -1 District. It was also pointed out that the B -W Zoning <br />Amendment proposed to apply to all B -W Districts in the City, not just the <br />Knox site. <br />Montour noted that the building in the back of the property shows as a one - <br />story, steel building. Montour asked if that type of construction would be <br />allowed in the B -W District. The City Planner pointed out that the building is <br />existing and would be grandfathered in. <br />Scalze asked about TIF assistance. The City Administrator indicated that the <br />TIF assistance would be generated from the new development on the property. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.