Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />DECEMBER 19, 2001 <br />Scalze pointed out that the <br />property is zoned commercial, and once developed, <br />occupied townoffices, down the line the units could become rental units o <br />the City loses control over the property. While the <br />could be combined into larger proposal is for owner - <br />a lot of traffic, ger spaces and occupied by businesses that <br />generate <br />Gosman pointed out that under the present zoning a bar or restaurant <br />development could be proposed which would <, <br />Gosman felt that having access via Park generate a great <br />Gos site which, in turn, c ess is Park Stre to mi t ot deal of retail use <br />limits the that does not genii use <br />a great deal of traffic. type that does not r <br />generate <br />LaValle felt he could not support the development proposal <br />Park Street. He pointed out that Rice Street is a busy posal if the access is via <br />expected on that street. If there would be difficulty moan et and turns from site onto Rice Street, exiting the site could be limited to right turn turns fro the <br />Gosman expressed concern about the willing ght turn only <br />pond relocation. Fahey indicated that the City shouldhnform Watershed at allow <br />that access via Rice Street is the only viable alternative <br />their cooperation in facilitating Watershed <br />that the cooperation in <br />neighborhood g that access through ' and that we Fahey felt <br />ghborhood needs to be protected, pond relocation. unless Fahey felt <br />the pond is totally unfeasible. p otected, and unless relocating <br />Gosman stated that they were not opposed to having <br />the access via Rice Street, <br />but felt it would be nearly impossible to get it done. <br />The City Administrator reported that he discussed this with the <br />they will look at the issue as part of'their review of the development proposal. <br />It does not appear Watershed and <br />ppear that it would be impossible to mitigate p pin <br />access via Rice Street, ate w <br />g etlands and gain <br />Fahey asked if there was TIF assistance that could be p r ovided to the developer <br />to help with the cost of relocating the pond so that access can be via Rice <br />Street. The City Administrator reported that TIF assistance w <br />option. The best option may be <br />options. e a tax abatement of find not <br />portion of the City''s s share <br />Scalze pointed out that this parcel of land went tax forfeit <br />beca <br />problem parcel. Scalze felt that the price of the property use it v a of t <br />fact, and it should be no surprise to the developer that this is a difficult piecerof <br />property to develop. Scalze agreed that commercial traffic should utilize Rice <br />Street. <br />10 <br />