My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-2012 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
05-23-2012 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2012 7:53:55 AM
Creation date
5/21/2012 7:47:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
instances of leaks in the service line from the main all the way into the building. Of the <br />few leaks we have seen most if not all have been right at the connection to the main <br />(called the corporation or "corp" for short) or at the curb stop on one side or the other. <br />All of the service lines in the City are either copper or plastic so staff does not see leaks <br />in the pipe becoming a problem in the future either. A recent leak was suspected to be in <br />the copper line between the "corp" and the curb stop but it ended up being a pinhole leak <br />in the "corp" <br />The one gray area this ordinance revision leaves is leaks at the curb stop. The question is <br />on which side of the curb stop is the leak. hl most eases it is not known which side the <br />leak is on until the area is excavated down to the bottom of the curb stop. Therefore, staff <br />proposes that if leaks are suspected at the curb stop, the City hire a contractor to excavate <br />down and perform the repair. Regardless of which side the leak is on the cost will be <br />split 50/50 between the City and the property owner. This will eliminate having to dig <br />down and then decide who is responsible for the rest of the work. The parties share in the <br />cost and the work is completed in a timely fashion. The property owner would be <br />informed up front of the policy and the City would obtain at least two quotes from <br />different contractors for the work. The property owner would then be billed for his or her <br />portion of the work by the City and could pay it in full or have the amount assessed to <br />property taxes. <br />1 have seen other cities' ordinances use both interpretations. Some use the Language we <br />currently have and some use the language staff is proposing. Staff believes this change <br />will better protect our infrastructure and enhance customer service to our residents. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.