My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-23-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
01-23-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 1:50:29 PM
Creation date
5/22/2012 2:12:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fact Sheet Environmental Consequences of Our Solid Waste Management Choices Page 2 of 3 <br />Are some methods of managing solid waste better than other methods, <br />in terms of adversely affecting the environment? <br />'s. For over 20 years the State has encouraged methods of solid waste management other than <br />wrung landfills. State law includes a waste management goal and order of preferred waste <br />management methods (often called the "waste management hierarchy "): <br />The waste management goal of the state is to foster an integrated waste management system in a <br />manner appropriate to the characteristics of the waste stream and thereby protect the state's land, <br />air, water, and other natural resources and the public health. The following waste management <br />practices are in order of preference: <br />* waste reduction and reuse; <br />*waste recycling; <br />* composting of yard waste and food waste; <br />resource recovery through mixed municipal solid waste composting or incineration; <br />• land disposal with methane recovery; and, <br />to land disposal without methane recovery. <br />The Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance (MOEA) has stated: <br />*As we generate and manage more waste, particularly by landfilling, we will lose opportunities <br />to decrease pollution and greenhouse gases, increase liability exposure, and create eyesores in <br />our communities. <br />ur 2000 the MOEA reviewed several recent studies and concluded: <br />Research indicates that there are considerable resource savings and environmental and <br />economic benefits from the reduction, reuse, recycling, and recovery of solid waste. Despite <br />this fact, landfilling continues to be an increasing method of disposal. The studies conducted to <br />date support the solid waste management hierarchy set out in Minnesota statute. They <br />demonstrate that environmental benefits such as resource conservation, energy conservation, <br />and reduced pollution accrue as waste is reduced or managed as a resource. <br />What can be done to reduce adverse environmental consequences of <br />managing solid waste? <br />Ramsey and Washington Counties have solid waste master plans that have been approved by the <br />State of Minnesota. These plans call for an integrated solid waste management system that <br />mirrors the State "hierarchy" of waste management methods. Thus, these plans emphasize waste <br />reduction (often called "source reduction "), recycling, composting of yard and food waste, and <br />resource recovery of remaining trash as much as possible. Landfills are still needed for some <br />wastes, but are the least preferred method. <br />ttp: / /www.co.ramsey.mn.us /recovery/ fact_ sheet_environmental_consequ.htm 1/18/02 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.