My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-27-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
02-27-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 1:54:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2012 2:37:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEB 14 '02 05 :32PM BRAUN INTERTEC P.10/24 <br />Drywall Supply, Inc. <br />BBXX- 02 -010A <br />January 29, 2002 <br />Page 6 <br />While light- weight structures such as metal storage buildings are more tolerant of differential <br />movement, o.tticc /warehouse structures with light to moderately loaded lineal footings and coltunns <br />are less forgiving to excessive total and differential settlement. In our opinion, supporting the <br />buildings on typical spread footing foundations and supporting the slabs -on -grade would incur high <br />risk — much higher than what would normally he acceptable. For this reason, deep soil corrections <br />(soil corrections to at least remove the existing till and organic materials) or alternative foundation <br />systems would be needed to provide a suitable building pad and foundation support. Based on the <br />borings, it appears that excavation depths needed to remove the existing fill and organic soils would <br />range between about I 1 to 23 feet. Given the depth of the excavations required and the presence of <br />groundwater however, in our opinion, removing the unsuitable soils (an excavation /backfilI <br />approach), although possible, would he difficult. Additionally, settlement of unexcavated lacustrine <br />soils (soft days) would still occur under the weight of excavation backtill and additional fill needed <br />to achieve design grade that would necessitate at least a construction delay period. <br />Even if spread footing construction is abandoned in favor of alternate support options such as drilled <br />piers, piles or GeopiersTM , settlement of the ground in general should be expected to occur over <br />time in areas where new fill is added to existing site grades. Settlement or the existing fill and <br />organic soils under their own weight will also occur throughout much of the site as the materials <br />continue to consolidate over line. For this reason, sidewalks, curbs, concrete and bituminous <br />pavements, and other at grade structures will be subject to differential movements. <br />C.2.b. Affect of Groundwater on Construction. Groundwater was encountered at depths of <br />about 9 feet. Excavations extending below the groundwater level to remove unsuitable soils will <br />also need to be dewatered making the excavations more difficult. For this reason, alternative <br />foundations types such as GeopiersM , drill piers or piles appear to be more applicable-for this site. <br />C.3. Alternate Foundation Support Options <br />With the present information, it appears that performing an excavation to remove the unsuitable <br />soils and accommodate spread footing foundations will he impractical. Given the soil conditions, in <br />our opinion, deep foundations such as drilled piers, piles or GeopiersTM should be considered. The <br />following paragraphs briefly describe each foundation system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.