My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-27-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
02-27-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 1:54:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2012 2:37:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Competition. Other building owners in the area may believe that the City is unfairly competing <br />with them <br />Legal challenges. The uniqueness of this financing may cause a taxpayer to challenge the <br />validity of this project. Because it is unusual, the financing may be subject to some legal <br />scrutiny. <br />Bond rating. While this issue would not likely cause a rating decrease for the City, if the project <br />defaults the cost of debt service may inhibit the ability of the City to receive future bond rating <br />increases. <br />Difficulties of public /private partnerships. The public nature of arrangements which are <br />traditionally private may cause difficulties for the private partner and the City in this financing. <br />The City does have difficulty negotiating in private and may compound any potential future issue <br />as the project develops. <br />As I mentioned previously, we should touch base with Briggs & Morgan to discuss the legal <br />details of this type of financing. We look forward to discussing these issues further. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.