Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 27, 2002 <br />VARIANCE — <br />SAVAGE LANE/ <br />ROSE LANE — <br />SAM ROBERTO <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -2 -32 — TABLING ACTION ON THE NORM'S <br />TIRES' REQUEST FOR REZONING AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />PENDING A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING <br />COMMISSION <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Scalze, Montour, Anderson, Fahey <br />Nays (0)_ Resolution declared adopted. <br />Fahey opened the continuation of Public Hearing to consider the request <br />of Sam Roberto for a setback variance property located on the northeast <br />corner of Savage Lane and Rose Lane so that he can construct a single - <br />family house and avoid poor soils on this property. It was noted that Mr. <br />Roberto is also requesting that the Council call for a vacation hearing for <br />vacation of a portion of the Savage Lane right- of=way as well as the north 10 <br />feet of Rose Lane. It was noted that the Planning Commission has <br />recommended denial of the variance request as there was no hardship present <br />to warrant granting the variance. Fahey also noted that the Planning <br />Commission did not have the benefit of the Braun Intertec report relative to <br />soil conditions on the property. <br />Sam Roberto appeared before the Council and reviewed his plan for <br />constructing a residential house on this property. He indicated that he is <br />equesting a 10 -foot variance from the standard 30 -foot setback to allow house <br />placement on the most suitable portion of the property. The variance would be <br />'or the rear yard of the house as it lies in relation to Rose Lane. Roberto <br />eviewed his reasoning for the variance that would allow him to build on the <br />ost stable, dry earth that is available on this lot. There will be some soils <br />placement needed on the west portion of the lot, but a natural buffer on the <br />stern portion of the lot would be maintained from the adjacent wetland area <br />oberto then reviewed his reasons for avoiding construction on the eastern half <br />f the lot, pointing out that there are deep swamp deposits and a high ground <br />ter table. He noted that there would need to be substantial fill brought into <br />s portion of the property in order to support a house. Roberto then pointed <br />t that Braun Intertec performed soil borings in May of 2001 on this property <br />d verified that soil replacement is necessary. Roberto also referred to the <br />y Planner's report confirming the low /wet land on the eastern portion of the <br />indicating that that half of the lot appears to be unbuildable, and <br />ornmending approval of the variance. Roberto indicated that the Watershed <br />indicated there is no official wetland on the lot, but rather swamp deposits. <br />Watershed has also indicated the need for a buffer to the adjacent wetland <br />m <br />re <br />ea <br />R <br />0 <br />wa <br />th1 <br />ou <br />an <br />Cit <br />lot, <br />rec <br />has <br />The <br />area <br />