My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
03-13-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2012 3:00:39 PM
Creation date
5/22/2012 2:50:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
II. WATERSHED ISSUES: <br />As mentioned previously 20.28 acres is in the "Protected" wetland category which <br />is the highest category of wetland. Multiple interviews with the Ramsey Washington <br />Metro Watershed District have confirmed that this particular wetland is in the "Protect" <br />category as opposed to "Manage 1 ", "Manage 2 ", or "Utilize" wetland. The wetland is <br />comprised of 3 open water areas = 250,218 ft. squared. One of the open water areas has <br />the DNR designation of a Lake. Three (3) "emergent" (cattails) = 896,099 ft. squared <br />and 1 scrub/shrub area = 231,240 ft. squared. The wetland is currently a "healthy" <br />wetland. It serves our area preventing flooding and filtering out sediments and <br />nutrients which would otherwise be passed on to Lake Gervais. By allowing destruction <br />of the mature forest which sits on the 7.347 acres a number of impacts will occur: <br />A. Soil - The forest would need to be cut down. The land would need to he excavated. <br />An exorbitant amount of fill of a different quality from that which now exists naturally <br />would need to he brought in. The slope of the area would be impacted by greater than <br />15% and in some areas 40% which may violate a city ordinance regarding hill <br />destruction. In any event, the overall topography of the 7.3 acres would he dramatically <br />changed. This would effect the way the water flows into the wetland. With construction <br />there would he no forest. There would be erosion because of the sharp changes in <br />topography. There would be a dramatic change in the plant life that filters the water <br />which would ultimately impact this "protected" wetland. Construction of homes <br />inevitably brings in impervious surfaces (roofs, asphalt, metal, plastic, rubber) all of <br />which would change the flow of stormwater going down into the healthy wetland. The <br />overall effect of this deforestation, change in topography, change in waterflow into the <br />wetland effects the "effluent" flowing out of the wetland. The 20.28 acres are part of a <br />system which filters water beginning to the north and west of the area. The water flows <br />into this basin passing under Sunset Court into another active wetland and into Lake <br />Gervais. From Lake Gervais the water flows into Lake Keller, then on to Lake Phalen <br />where it is finally taken by stormsewer to the Mississippi River. By taking out this 7.3 <br />acres of mature forest, changing the soil and water Clow, adding carcinogenic surfaces, <br />the overall effectiveness of the filtering ability of this wetland will he compromised. As <br />it exists now it is a virginal area. The Watershed District requires that they ask <br />proposers /developers "Sequencing" questions in regard to any construction near to a <br />protected wetland. The first question is: Why is this project necessary and why does <br />this project have to go here? The second question is: What will you do to minimize the <br />impact on the wetland? The citizens are concerned about the overall water quality in <br />Little Canada. Of special concern is groundwater and the quality of water in our sporting <br />areas such as Lake Gervais and Lake Keller. <br />B. Ecosystem - At present the area of concern is a healthy ecosystem composed of a <br />very large variety of plant and animal species. By changing the flow of water and <br />secondarily damaging the soil the upland species will go elsewhere and the downland <br />species will also slowly disappear. The United States Government Environmental <br />Protection Agency (EPA ) and the State of Minnesota are asking citizens and their cities <br />to restore such wetlands. We are facing destruction of one that is working in perfect <br />harmony with its surroundings. Once it is gone it is gone forever and we cannot put it <br />back. <br />C. Deforestation - This is a mature urban forest with hardwoods that are over 100 <br />years old. There are thousands of trees on this land. One mature tree through the <br />process of "photosynthesis" produces enough oxygen throughout its life to support the <br />entire lifespan of 30 humans. Again to use the sequencing argument of the RWMWD - Is <br />this necessary? Does this demolition /construction have to go here? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.