Laserfiche WebLink
COMMUNITY PRIDE <br />1953 — 2003 <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 <br />(651) 766 -4029 / FAX: (651) 766 -4048 <br />wwwci.little- canada.mn.us <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor Fahey & Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Greg Schroeder, Public Works Director <br />DATE: October 16, 2003 <br />RE: Schmidt /Sprosty /Kerr Swale <br />MAYOR <br />Michael I. Fahey <br />COUNCIL <br />Jim LaVatle <br />Matt Anderson <br />Rick Montour <br />Bill Blesener <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel 12. Hanson. <br />Attached is an excavating permit to construct a swale at the intersection of the rear property lines of <br />627 Keller Parkway and 2718 Edgerton Street. This proposal is very similar to that which was <br />approved for this site several years ago, except that the City will not dig the swale as originally <br />proposed. <br />Background <br />As you may recall Jack Schmidt's suit against the City and his claim that a pond was eliminated by <br />the Kerr's (627 Keller Parkway) as part of the construction of their new home. The City issued the <br />filling and grading permit that allowed this to occur. (We also involved the Ramsey/Washington <br />Metro Watershed District in the approval of this permit.) The City also vacated a drainage easement <br />covering this same area. What was unknown to any of us is that Mr. Schmidt had installed a drain <br />tile into this area to give the low area of his lot an outlet (this installation occurred many years <br />previous to the filling activity). His installation was undertaken without any approval, knowledge, <br />or permits of the City based on the records we reviewed. <br />We had worked with the involved property owners (Schmidt, Sprosty & Kerr) at the time this issue <br />initially came to our attention. We thought we had an agreement to resolve the matter, but Mr. <br />Schmidt would not release all parties from his claims. The matter then fell apart and Mr. Schmidt <br />initiated a lawsuit against the City, Watershed, and Kerr's. <br />After considerable discussion between the various parties, we returned to the approval of an <br />agreement. The proposed agreement was very similar to that which we approved a couple of years <br />ago. Essentially, we (the City) dig the hole for the swale (pond) and the property owners establish <br />turf and provide on -going maintenance. The City has no further role in the matter. We are also <br />released from claims associated with this issue. There is also an acknowledgement that the adequacy <br />of the swale to eliminate flooding is not being represented by any of parties to this agreement. The <br />Council approved this proposed agreement in May 2003, however all involved property owners have <br />never executed it. <br />PI: \GregS \Pi 11 Permits \Schmidt- Sprosty• -Ken Swde.dos <br />