My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-2003 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
09-10-2003 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2012 3:07:07 PM
Creation date
6/14/2012 3:05:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
total package when they know what the county budgets are, when the local <br />levies are set and so forth. They feel as we move forward into November and <br />December for all the levies there may be something that is on the table and still <br />can work together between now and then. <br />St. Anthony <br />Not Represented <br />Spring Lake Park <br />Not represented /Sent letter (Attached) <br />Shoreview <br />Terry Schwerm, the City Manager of Shoreview, told the group this proposal had <br />not really been discussed with their city council, however, in general, they have <br />been supportive of the County potentially passing an HRA levy. The city of <br />Shoreview has seen a tremendous benefit from the Housing Resource Center, <br />both because of accessibility and making it well known to the residents. If there <br />were a levy, Shoreview would use whatever funds might be allocated to finance <br />the Housing Resource Center and potentially use additional monies to administer <br />programs and grants as allocations received from the Minnesota Housing <br />Finance Agency and other resources have been used up. Because of State <br />cutbacks making certain monies not available, it is important to continue housing <br />programs because they are seeing degradation of theft neighborhoods and need <br />funds for upkeep and code enforcement. Again, Mr. Schwerm stated, in general, <br />the city of Shoreview is supportive of this proposal. One reason is, if they wanted <br />to supplement it, they could do so on top of the county HRA and could actually <br />fund the HRC and put more dollars into it. <br />One issue the city of Shoreview sees regarding the HRC is that because it is <br />located in Shoreview, they, along with Roseville, are the heaviest users. Mr. <br />Schwerm suggested perhaps there should be a second office on the eastern end <br />of suburban Ramsey County so that residents of Maplewood, White Bear, <br />Vadnais Heights, Little Canada and others were a closer to the service. Maybe <br />one of focals could be the County contracting directly with the HRC to provide the <br />service countywide because, for example, the 35W coalition contracts, would see <br />some benefit by taking it off of their levy or general fund and putting it on the <br />county HRA. That would help reduce at least an expenditure that is currently in <br />the budget and general fund. The city of Shoreview feels the proposed county <br />administrative costs of 5% of the revenue are reasonable, and while they might <br />quibble a little bit about how some of the other funding allocations are set up, this <br />is a good start. He stated they fully commend the-County for putting the proposal <br />together because housing is a big issue and the upkeep of housing, especially, is <br />going to be critical as we all come to address affordable housing improvements. <br />Commissioner Weissner asked Commissioner Rettman if the proposal included <br />funding for the HRC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.