My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-24-2003 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
09-24-2003 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2012 3:28:22 PM
Creation date
6/14/2012 3:08:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City has worked with the landowner over the years to limit or prohibit access to Park <br />Street, requiring access to County Road C from that building. <br />The subject site has no frontage other than the Park Street side. As a result, alternative <br />access cannot be provided, unless the parcel were to be combined with other adjoining <br />property. However, due to extensive wetland impacts on the site, development capacity <br />is severely limited. The applicant's site plan illustrates a basic single family home with <br />an attached garage, meeting setbacks from Park Street and showing a 30 foot setback <br />from the wetland edge. This would meet City requirements, although the Watershed <br />District may have additional concerns. <br />If the site remains commercially zoned, it has little development capacity due to both <br />setback requirements, drainage issues, and the need for parking. Moreover, the access <br />for this commercial site (although low volume) would need to be from Park Street, <br />inconsistent with the actions taken on the adjoining parcels. In Planning staff's view, the <br />site has little value as a commercially zoned property. <br />As a residential property, it would appear that it can accommodate a single family home, <br />consistent with the development of the Park Street neighborhood in this area. The <br />existence of a single family home on this site would, however, be inconsistent with the <br />adjoining property west of Park Street. A higher density project would not resolve this <br />inconsistency, <br />In summary, the proposed single family home appears to be the most likely <br />development capacity of the site. Planning staff would recommend a rezoning to R -1, <br />Single Family Residential (rather than the R -2 requested by the applicant) to be clear <br />about the City's zoning intent. <br />pc: Kathy Glanzer <br />Steve Westerhaus <br />Lee Elfering <br />Greg Schroeder <br />Mike Torkelson, 100 Village Center Drive, North Oaks, MN <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.