Laserfiche WebLink
Council Members, <br />The variance is due to this building being (by definition) a second accessory building. The <br />project was scaled back when my family shrunk in size. I no longer need the addition that was <br />planned which would connect the spa building to the house. (See attached document A, original <br />plans. The new project is the same minus the house edition.) The building is already built and is <br />built to code. I applied for a building permit in march of 2003 and the plans were sent back due <br />to the font of the setbacks beingip small focsteve Westerhouse to read._(Lcan read theinso I <br />thought he would be able to also.) <br />Please let me know what I can do further to get the building right in the cities eyes. <br />Sincerely, <br />