Laserfiche WebLink
1450998v8 <br />(a) Seek administrative review or judicial review of the applicability <br />of any tax statute relating to ad valorem property taxation of the Development <br />Property that any tax official determines is applicable to the Development <br />Property or raise the inapplicability of any such statute as a defense in any <br />proceedings with respect to the Development Property, including delinquent tax <br />proceedings; <br />(b) Seek administrative review or judicial review of the <br />constitutionality of any tax statute relating to the taxation of the Development <br />Property that any tax official determines to be applicable to the Development <br />Property, or raise the unconstitutionality of any such tax statute as a defense in <br />any proceedings, including, but not limited to, delinquent tax proceedings, with <br />respect to the Development Property; <br />(c) Seek any tax deferral or abatement, either presently or <br />prospectively authorized under Minnesota Statutes Section 569.181 or any other <br />state or federal law, of the ad valorem property taxation of the Development <br />Property. <br />8.2. Payment of Tax Increment Shortfall and Shortfall Guaranty. "Tax <br />Increment Shortfall" means: the difference between $9,203.00 and the amount of the Tax <br />Increments the EDA actually receives which are derived from the real estate tax payment <br />due and payable with respect to the Development Property on May 15, 2005; the <br />difference between $9.203.00 and the amount of the Tax Increments the EDA actually <br />receives which are derived from the real estate tax payment due and payable with respect <br />to the Development Property on October 15, 2005; the difference between $36,005.00 <br />and the amount of the Tax Increments the EDA actually receives which are derived from <br />the real estate tax payment due and payable with respect to the Development Property on <br />May 15, 2006; the difference between $36,005.00 and the amount of the Tax Increments <br />the EDA actually receives which are derived from the real estate tax payment due and <br />payable with respect to the Development Property on October 15, 2006; and the <br />difference between $62,692.00 and the amount of the Tax Increments the EDA actually <br />receives which are derived from the real estate tax payment due and payable with respect <br />to the Development Property on each May 15 or October 15 thereafter through and <br />including October 15, 2022. On or before July 1, 2005 the EDA will give the Developer <br />written notice of the amount of the Tax Increment Shortfall, if any, resulting from the real <br />estate tax payment due and payable with respect to the Development Property on the <br />preceding May 15, 2005, and on or before each January 1 and July 1 thereafter through <br />and including January 1, 2023, the EDA will give the Developer written notice of the <br />amount of the Tax Increment Shortfall, if any, resulting from the real estate tax payment <br />due and payable with respect to the Development Property on the May 15 (in the case of <br />an July notice) or October 15 (in the case of a January notice), and the Developer must <br />pay the amount of the Tax Increment Shortfall set forth in the notice to the EDA within <br />thirty days of the Developer's receipt of the EDA's notice. The FDA's failure to give the <br />Developer written notice of the amount of the Tax Increment Shortfall on or before the <br />dates set forth in this Section 8.2 does not relieve the Developer of the obligation to pay <br />the amount of the Tax Increment Shortfall to the EDA within 30 days of the date the <br />- 1 4 - <br />