Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JULY 10, 2003 <br />abutting the cul -de -sac, so obviously the jogged line for Lot 4 is the rear <br />property line. A 30 -foot setback must be maintained from the rear <br />property line. <br />Carlson indicated that the plat assumes that this line is a side lot line, and <br />that he would debate whether this was actually the rear lot line for Lot 4. <br />Keis pointed out that rear lot lines are defined by code, and this was not an <br />item for debate. Barraclough pointed out that the house could be turned in <br />order to meet the 30 -foot setback requirement. <br />With regard to Lot 2, Barraclough pointed out that the house could be <br />pushed back into the lot if there was a problem meeting setbacks with less <br />than 75 feet in width in the area of the building pad. Carlson agreed, <br />pointed out that the impact would be a longer driveway for the house. <br />Keis asked about storm water drainage for this plat. The Engineer <br />indicated that the developers will need to provide a storm water pond that <br />will either flow into Twin Lake or into the 694 right -of -way. He reported <br />that the City has been considering the reconstruction of streets in the Twin <br />Lake area including the installation of water main. Part of this <br />improvement includes the determination of an outlet for storm water. One <br />option being explored is the routing of storm water to 694. MN DOT has <br />not yet indicated whether this is possible, and they are considering it as <br />part of their design of the Unweave the Weave project. <br />Jim Leibel, Twin Lake Blvd., appeared before the Commission indicating <br />that he owns the property immediately west of the proposed plat. Leibel <br />noted previous discussion of the future development potential of his <br />property, and questioned whether his property would be subject to <br />Shoreland Ordinance regulations. The City Planner indicated that the <br />Shoreland Ordinance extends to properties within 1,000 feet of a <br />shoreline. Properties within this distance need to be a minimum of 15,000 <br />square feet in size if they do not abut the shoreline, and 20,000 square feet <br />in size if they do abut. <br />Leibel estimated that his property was over 1,000 feet from the Twin Lake <br />shoreline. Leibel indicated that as part of the Hamel Estates plat, he <br />would like an easement provided that would give him access to the new <br />cul -de -sac. Leibel pointed out that he has a very steep driveway, and such <br />an easement would provide him access to the rear of his property if he <br />ever needed to get a large piece of equipment into his property. <br />Leibel reported that Kris Krengle had contacted him to determine if he <br />was interested in developing the rear yard of his property. Krengle <br />informed him that he would have to pay $60,000 to develop a lot from his <br />5 <br />