My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-09-2003 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
07-09-2003 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2014 2:48:46 PM
Creation date
6/21/2012 10:48:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The subsequent changes included on Attachment E are as follows: <br />➢ Final legislation allowed for the City to recover 60% of the aids to be cut in 2004 in its 2004 <br />levy. The cumulative aid cut for 2004 was $196,705, therefore, $118,023 will be allowed to <br />be levied back ($196,705 x .60 = $118,023). In addition to this recovery, the City levy limit <br />equation for 2004 (as we interpreted the formula) allows for an additional $13,917 to be <br />levied which is representative of the low income housing credit. Therefore, the City will be <br />allowed to raise its levy by $131,940 in 2004. <br />➢ There will be no additional cuts in LGA and MVHC for 2004 as originally anticipated. This <br />positively impacts the General Fund by $33,468 in 2004. <br />➢ The current legislation anticipates that LGA and MVFIC will be restored for 2005. <br />Additionally, a new LGA formula will be implemented increasing the City aid payment by <br />$24,018 based on 2003 figures. We have excluded the restoration of these funds from the <br />shortfall calculations on Attachment E due to economic uncertainty. <br />➢ The transfer of the water utility system has been included at a loss of funds of $15,000. <br />However, this is a conservative figure for budget purposes. It is anticipated that with a 30% <br />surcharge on billing plus negotiating more favorable sharing ratios on water tower rentals and <br />other items, we may be able to achieve no net cost associated with the transfer. Additionally, <br />the transfer could result in labor savings or shifts. <br />➢ Restoration Sister City travel expenses as directed earlier. <br />➢ Possible restoration of certain cuts made in 2003 for 2004 and beyond. Staff has reviewed the <br />detailed listing of cuts made earlier in 2003. (See attachment F.) Upon this review, it was <br />determined that the majority of these cuts should remain in effect for 2004. The following <br />cuts are the items the Council may want to consider restoring in 2004: <br />City Administrator Conference Expense $1,000 <br />Fall Street Sweeping $3,000 <br />Public Works Travel /Conferences $1,000 <br />Newsletter (increase from 4 to 6 issues) $3,800 <br />MRPA Conference $1,000 <br />Skating Facilities $7,700 <br />$17,500 <br />While the ultimate restoration of these items may be evaluated at a later date, the restoration <br />would impact the possible amount of franchise fee adopted. Therefore, the above total is <br />included on Attachment E. <br />These changes result in deficits of $20,804 for 2003, $83,082 for 2004, and $116,596 for 2005. It <br />would be staff's recommendation to use the LGA contingency reserve to deal with the 2003 shortfall. <br />Since this is a one -time use reserve and the deficit will be recurring, we are only suggesting its use <br />for 2003. Furthermore, any franchise fee collected during 2003 would further mitigate this deficit. <br />3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.