My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-09-2003 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
07-09-2003 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2014 2:48:46 PM
Creation date
6/21/2012 10:48:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Utilities $50,000 <br />Installation of Streets and Sidewalks $50,000 <br />Interest $400,000 <br />Administrative Expenses (up to 10 %) $100,000 <br />PROJECT COSTS TOTAL $1,564,000 <br />The above budget is organized according to the Office of State Auditor (OSA) reporting forms. '*Subject to <br />change prior to the public hearing. <br />Estimated costs associated with the District are subject to change among categories without a modification <br />to this TIF Plan. All tax increments from the District are authorized to be used on costs of the City's the <br />District. Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.176, Sztbd 4(c), revenues derived from increments must be spent only <br />to assist the facility directly or for administrative expenses. <br />Subsection 2 -11. Fiscal Disparities Election <br />Pursuant to MS., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the City may elect one of two methods to calculate fiscal <br />disparities. If the calculations pursuant to MS., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause a, (outside the District) are <br />followed, the following method of computation shall apply: <br />(1) The original net tax capacity and the current net tax capacity shall be determined before the <br />application of the fiscal disparity provisions of Chapter 276A or 473F. Where the original net <br />tax capacity is equal to or greater than the current net tax capacity, there is no captured net tax <br />capacity and no tax increment determination. Where the original net tax capacity is less than <br />the current net tax capacity, the difference between the original net tax capacity and the current <br />net tax capacity is the captured net tax capacity. This amount less any portion thereofwhich the <br />authority has designated, in its tax increment financing plan, to share with the local taxing <br />districts is the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority. <br />(2) The county auditor shall exclude the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority from the <br />net tax capacity of the local taxing districts in determining local taxing district tax rates. The <br />local tax rates so determined are to be extended against the retained captured net tax capacity <br />of the authority as well as the net tax capacity of the local taxing districts. The tax generated by <br />the extension of the lesser of (A) the local taxing district tax rates or (8) the original local tax <br />rate to the retained captured net fax capacity of the authority is the tax increment of the <br />authority. <br />The City shall submit to the County Auditor at the time of the request for certification which method of <br />computation of fiscal disparities the City elected. <br />The City will choose to calculate fiscal disparities by clause b, meaning that increment will be taken <br />from inside the district. <br />According to MS., Section 469.177, Sttbd. 3: <br />(c) The method of computation of tax increment applied to a district pursuant to paragraph (a) or <br />(b) shall remain the same for the duration of the district, except that the governing body may <br />elect to change its election from the method of computation in paragraph (a) to the method in <br />paragraph (b). <br />City of Litt lc Canada Tax Increment Financing 1'lan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 -2 2-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.