Laserfiche WebLink
Results Page 2 of 8 <br />With 39,343 ha of Type 3, 4, and 5 wetlands in Twin Cites, we estimated that the area could support <br />118,000 breeding pairs, or a summer population of 472,000 geese (236,000 adults plus 236,000 <br />young), assuming a conservative production of 2 goslings per nesting attempt (Sayler, 1977). If the <br />birds were to nest colonially, as they do on islands (Ewaschuk and Boag 1972), then, the maximum <br />population would be higher. Moreover, because Canada geese do not breed until 2 or 3 years of age <br />(Cooper 1978) and these non - breeding birds make a molt migration to northern areas in summer <br />(Zicus 1981, Fashingbauer 1993), the fall population when the molt migrants return are typically <br />twice that of summer. Thus, if the summer population were to approach one -half million geese, the <br />fall population would likely be >1 million. <br />Geese were found on 107 of 254 (42 %) wetlands randomly surveyed wetlands in 1994. The <br />amount of open shoreline, estimated to the nearest 25 %, ranged from none (36 %), 1 -25 (30 %), 26 -50 <br />(11 %), 51 -75 (19 %), and 76 -100 (4%). Wetlands with geese had a significantly higher (P <.05) <br />amount of shoreline mowed or pastured than those without geese (Figure 2). To assess the <br />relationship between the a length of shoreline habitat and geese using the wetland, we computed <br />shoreline length as circumference of a circle with an area equal to that of the wetland. Shoreline <br />grass - pasture length was then calculated multiplying circumference by the percent of shoreline in <br />mowed or pastured grass. This yielded a minimum shoreline estimate for the respective wetlands <br />inasmuch as few of the water areas were round. We found a strong relationship between the amount <br />of grass shoreline and the number of geese at site (Figure 3). <br />During the 1994 survey 2,313 geese were counted on the 254 wetlands sampled. The expanded <br />population estimate was 25,000 birds; less than 25% of the level predicted by the exponential model <br />(Figure 1). Geese were found most frequently on type 5 wetlands (47 %), lakes (42 %), and least often <br />on type 4 marshes (28 %); group sizes averaged 25 birds on type 4, 28 in type 5, and 34 on lakes, and <br />were not significantly different (P >.05). Goose densities per km2 of wetland and lake were <br />significantly higher (P <.05) in the cities and towns closed to hunting (61/km2) than those open to <br />goose shooting 22 /km2). <br />Goose Complaint Levels <br />Goose complaints were received for 391 locations during the 1982 -96 period and 176 of these <br />sites visited at the time of the complaint. Summer brood - rearing period problems were most common <br />(94 %). The 23 fall complaints came from primarily from golf courses (11), athletic fields (3), and <br />airports (3). Most complaints came from residential sites (52 %), followed by parks (17 %), golf <br />courses (16 %), swimming beaches (10 %), and corporate grounds (6 %). The geese causing a <br />complaint was highly variable, ranging from 4 to 456 and averaged 70 birds, SD =62. Among <br />complaint classes, commercial sites had the lowest tolerance threshold (59) and beach areas the <br />highest (87); ANOVA showed no <br />Aber of Wetlands <br />1001 <br />60 - <br />60- <br />40 - <br />f <br />• Geese <br />® No Geese <br />-36- <br />http://www.fw.umn.edu/ research /goose /html /urban /manage6.html 4/7/00 <br />