My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-2003 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
06-24-2003 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2012 12:49:46 PM
Creation date
6/21/2012 12:42:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JUNE 12, 2003 <br />Knudsen asked if the Planning Commission were inclined to deny this <br />CUP request, what would be appropriate issues on which to base a denial. <br />The Planner pointed out that issues of public safety may not be appropriate <br />given the Fire Chiefs review of this matter. However, if the Commission <br />had concerns with traffic flow based on the proposed location, that would <br />be a legitimate basis for denial. <br />Keis asked if granting the CUP would provided for annual Fireworks in <br />this location. The Planner indicated that the CUP would run with the land. <br />However, given the City's licensing authority for fireworks sales, the CUP <br />could be tied to the annual renewal of the fireworks sales license. If the <br />City has concerns with the operation from a public safety standpoint, as an <br />example, and the license is not renewed, then the CUP would lapse. <br />There was no one present from the general public wishing to comment on <br />this matter. <br />Roycraft asked about storage of the fireworks. The Planner noted that the <br />applicant has indicated that all fireworks would be displayed on tables, <br />and there would be no truck storage of excess merchandise. Once the <br />sales period is over, any unsold product would be packed up and hauled <br />away. <br />Duray pointed out that there is no information on what the tent would look <br />like. He noted all the redevelopment occurring in the area and expressed <br />concern about the appearance of the fireworks tent. The City Planner <br />indicated that there are architectural guidelines For this area, and if the <br />Commission was so inclined, it could deny the outdoor sales tent based on <br />non- compliance with those guidelines. <br />Wojcik noted that the tent would only be up for a period of approximately <br />ten days. <br />Duray recommended denial of the Conditional Use Permit for sale of <br />fireworks from a tent in the Market Place Shopping Center parking lot <br />given that no information has been presented showing the appearance of <br />the tent, that a tent would not comply with the architectural guidelines for <br />this area, and based on safety concerns with the sale of fireworks from a <br />tent. <br />Motion seconded by Roycraft. <br />Motion failed 3 to 4. Duray, Roycraft, Weihe voted in favor. Keis, <br />Knudsen, Barraclough, Wojcik voted against. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.