My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-2003 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
05-28-2003 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2014 2:41:38 PM
Creation date
6/21/2012 2:13:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. That in addition to the base contract there was a written change order request <br />that had been in dispute but was approved by the City in the amount of $1,944.94 as a <br />part of settlement discussions between the parties. <br />4. That the contract provided for a retainage of 5 percent of the base contract <br />price, which was $4,857.00. See Exhibit No. 40. <br />5. Request No. 3 was submitted from Plaintiff to Defendant on June 18, 2001, <br />but was revised on July 3, 2001, in which the balance due after retainage and prior <br />payments was $14,581.80. See Exhibit No. 40. <br />6. Payment of the amount $14,581.80 was made by the Defendant to the Plaintiff <br />on July 12, 2001. See Exhibit No. 41. <br />7. On June 29, 2001, the Defendant submitted a punch list to the Plaintiff. See <br />Exhibit No. 22. <br />8. On July 20, 2001 the punch list items were separated out as to who had the <br />obligations to complete each task. See Exhibit No. 25. <br />9. Several of the punch list items were not completed by the Plaintiff and the <br />Defendant had continued holding the 5 percent retainage funds pending the <br />completement of the punch list items when the parties met on August 29, 2001, in an <br />attempt to resolve their differences. <br />10. On August 29, 2001, an agreement was made in which the Plaintiff agreed to <br />complete the punch list items. In consideration of the agreement to complete the punch <br />list items, the City of Little Canada (Defendant) issued them a check for $5,000 on that <br />day. See Exhibit No. 41. <br /><- 5 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.