03-12-2003 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 26, 2003 Fahey noted that the Council just received the diagrams this evening, and it was the consensus of the Council to table action on this matter so that they had time to review the information and to allow the City Planner to review the diagrams and comment. Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO 2003 -2 -42 — T 4I3LING ACTION ON THE PUD PERMIT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN UNTIL THE !MARCH 12, 2003 MEETING PENDING A REPORT FROM THE CITY PLANNER AND CITY ADMINISTRATOR RELATIVE TO THE PLAN The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. Ayes (5) Fahey, LaValle, Montour, Blesener, Anderson. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. AMENDMENT Mayor Fahey opened the public hearing to consider the proposed TO ZONING amendment to the Zoning Code relative to temporary signs. It was noted CODE— that the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the TEMPO.RARY amendment as proposed. Fahey further noted that information relative to SIGNS temporary outdoor sales events will be presented by staff at a later date. There was no one present from the general public wishing to comment on this matter. Upon motion by LaValle, seconded by Montour, the public hearing was closed. Blesener noted the provision for multi - tenant buildings limiting temporary signs to no more than two tenants at a time. Blesener suggested that this provision limit to "no more than two tenants or 50% of the tenants at one time" in order to address multi- tenant buildings having only two tenants. Anderson questioned the deletion of the language relative to spotlights. The consensus was to retain the five -day limitation for spotlights as stated in the ordinance. Anderson questioned the wording relating to temporary signage for non- profit or <ganizations and the way the 14-day period is measured. The Council agreed drat the 14-day period should be measured backward from the date of the event, but agreed that the wording could be made clearer. - 2 5 -