Laserfiche WebLink
C\ <br />of Little Ca/l Q,a <br />COMMUNITY PRIDE <br />1953 — 2003 <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 <br />(651) 766 -4029 / FAX: (651) 766 -4048 <br />www ci.litde- canada. mn. us <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />RE: <br />MEMORANDUM <br />Mayor Fahey & Members of the City Council <br />Jessica Jagoe, Code Enforcement Officer <br />January 17, 2003 <br />Temporary Sign Ordinance <br />MAYOR <br />Michael I. Fahey <br />COUNCIL <br />Jim LaValle <br />Matt Anderson <br />Rick Montour <br />Bill Blesener <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel R. Hanson <br />The City Council had directed staff to review our temporary sign ordinance based on a survey of <br />surrounding cities as well as the issues we face in its administration. One of the primary concerns was the <br />number of permits per year that could be issued to any one property. Another concern was the equity for <br />businesses in multi- tenant properties versus those in single use buildings. Based on this review, our <br />reconunendations are as follow: <br />1. Our current ordinance allows each property three permits per year with no more than 60 days of <br />display for the entire year. Our survey shows one to two permits is most conunon with a range of <br />5 -30 days per permit. Staff's recommendation for single- tenant properties would be to allow <br />two permits per calendar year for display allowed for no more than 10 days and that a 60 <br />day waiting period be required between permits. <br />2. Multi- tenant properties are allowed three permits per year per property with no more than 60 days <br />of display for the entire year — the same as single tenant buildings. I surveyed six surrounding <br />cities and found the most common situation was to allow each business a certain number of <br />permits per year. Three of the cities allowed one to two permits per business a year, one city <br />allowed maximum number of permits that cannot exceed 30 days total, and one city allowed four <br />permits not to exceed 120 days total. The cities that had one to two permits a year limited their <br />permits to a range 5 -12 days of display. The cities that allowed more display days seemed to <br />average 30 days. Except for Falcon Heights only one sign could be issued per permit. My <br />recommendation would be to allow multi - tenant properties two permits per year per <br />business with a ten -day display limit. Also, I would suggest no temporary permit should be <br />granted for any given tenant while another temporary sign permit is in effect for that <br />property. Furthermore, there should be a one -week waiting period between the issuance of <br />permits for a multi - tenant property to help address the issue of continuous signs being <br />present on the property. <br />3. Another issue we have encountered involves community -based organizations utilizing off - <br />premises temporary signage. (Canadian Days, St. John's, etc.) I would estimate we have four to <br />six occasions per year where this occurs. My recommendation would be to allow community <br />based organizations with tax- exempt status, an address in the city, and that have been in <br />existence for at least three years to have one off - premise sign per event with display for up <br />H:UessicaATemp Sign Ordinance.doc <br />