01-03-2001 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 21, 2000 Pedersen asked how much office use is in the McKesson building. Pedersen was concerned that the McKesson building would set the tone for how this property developed, and noted that the building is mainly a warehouse use. Pedersen did not feel a corporate headquarters would go in a location such as this. Morelan pointed out that when the St. Paul Water Department began to consider the sale of this property, they approached the City asking what kind of use the City would be looking for. At that time the property was heavily wooded and had oak trees on it. Morelan indicated that based on that he thought a campus type development similar to St. Jude's would be preferable. Morelan further indicated that when Frattalone requested a grading permit for the site, there were some drawings presented showing the footprint of a building. However, there was never a specific concept for the property. At that time it was mentioned by the City Planner as well as Mr. Frattalone that given the railroad tracks, the setback required from the pond, and the Pioneer Cabinet buildings, the site may not attract a corporate user. Morelan pointed out that the Council never made a decision on a concept for the property, but acted on a grading permit. Morelan felt that there may be a higher and better use for the site than what Frattalone is proposing, but the question was how long would it take before that use is proposed. Morelan pointed out that Frattalone Excavating has been a good business and employs a lot of people. He would not like to see this business move out of Little Canada. Morelan pointed out that Frattalone has tried to market the property and has had no serious interest. Morelan further indicated that he would like to consider the Frattalone proposal. He felt the issue was valuation. If the development proposal had the proper valuation, outdoor storage issues could be worked out with screening requirements, etc. Fahey indicated that he did not envision a corporate headquarters developing on this site given the surrounding area as well as access issues. Scalze pointed out that she envisioned a high- quality development that would generate substantial tax dollars for the City. LaValle felt a $4 million project was substantial. It was pointed out that no TIF assistance is being requested. Fahey asked if Frattalone would store more equipment on the new site given it would be larger than his current location. Frattalone replied that he would not. He indicated that the times he is short of space is during winter months when equipment is brought in for repairs. Page 19