My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-19-2001 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
12-19-2001 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 1:39:30 PM
Creation date
6/25/2012 11:32:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANND G COMMISSIO :N <br />NOVEMBER 3. 2001 <br />ZONING The City Planner reported that atier the Council denied the church <br />ISSUES — proposal on the Knox property, a moratorium was adopted in order to <br />BUSL`4ESS, give the City time to study its Zoning Districts as well as whether or <br />INDUSTRIAL, not there was the need to rezone the Knox property. The Council <br />AND discussed the Knox site as a high end commercial/industrial site and <br />INDUSTRIAL- the fact that the current B -W zoning allows for outdoor storage. The <br />PARK Planner indicated that the Council is looking for feedback from the <br />DISTRICTS Planning Commission on these issues. The next step would be to call for a <br />public hearing in December to amend the Zoning Code and/or rezone the <br />ssoli--- Knox property. The moratorium expires in January. <br />Keis pointed out that close proximity of Ryan Industrial Park and the <br />current uses in that park including the Frattaione recycling business. <br />Roycraft felt that the Council had too defined an idea of development for <br />various sites to the point Mar development cannot occur. He pointed out <br />the Rice StreerfLittle Canada Road area as well as now the Knox property <br />fit that category. Roycraft stated that the City is not ready to do a <br />moratorium and suggested that the Council bring in the business <br />community to see what they want. <br />The City Planner indicated that the Council is interested in defining what <br />type of development happens in certain areas pointing out as an example <br />the City's efforts rhar resulted in the Blacktern Office Park. The Planner <br />indicated that the City is interested in pursuing a long-term vision versus <br />taking the first project that comes along that may not result in the <br />community's best long -term interests. <br />Rovcraft indicated that local business owners may have some ideas of <br />what they would prefer for the area, for example. large green spaces <br />versus trucking companies and warehouses. Roycraft stated that now is <br />the time to get a better Idea of the future of the area. Roycraft felt that <br />right now the uses were a mixed bag. <br />Keis stated that he was more concerned with the aesthetics of any <br />development proposal for the Knox property than with the specific use <br />itself. As an examcie. Keis pointed our D & T Trucking on Soutn <br />Owasso. The use is a :rucking company, but :he way :he property is used <br />and the buiiding are aestheticaily pleasing. <br />Roycraft stated that be would like to see a business campus use. a <br />commercial development with a lot of green space. <br />Duray felt that the Council was trying to be proactive in calling for a <br />moratorium to study :he situation. This will allow :ne Council to make <br />Page 99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.