My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-11-2000 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
10-11-2000 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2014 1:58:25 PM
Creation date
6/26/2012 2:05:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. and Mrs. Richard Nelson <br />2995 Vanderbie Street <br />Little Canada, MN 55117 <br />July 10, 2000 <br />City of Little Canada <br />515 Little Canada, MN 55I17 <br />Attention: Water Department <br />To Whom It May Concem: <br />y•.rs fire - <br />`%/y z/ 7 7 <br />I am writing in response to the attached invoice dated March 6, 2000. <br />In February of this year our well water pomp failed. In order to make the right decision financially we <br />gathereA all the necessary information and costs of installing city water verses tiring our current well water <br />system. Many calls were placed and a cost comparison of the two options was complied <br />However, when we called the City of Little (:anada and asked for a breakdown of costs involved with each <br />charge at no time were we given a cost of a water availability charge of 300.00 dollars — a substantial <br />number! That was the first time we contacted your office. The second was when we physically came into <br />your office and paid for our permit (see attached permit) as you can see — still no charge indicating WAC. <br />My point is simply this, had we received the right information the first time we may have chosen the later <br />of the two since 300.00 dollars is a substantial amount when comparing costs. Could this be a clerical <br />error or a simple human error? Regardless, I have been seriously misled with information not once but <br />twice. <br />I hope that your concern about this situation will make it possible for you to resolve it without any further <br />action on my part. <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.