Laserfiche WebLink
Mr, Hanson <br />June 9, 2000 <br />Page Three <br />by permitted, or any preference by liven by law to any religious establishment or mode of <br />worship; ..., nor shall any money be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any <br />religious societies or religious or theological seminaries." <br />The establishment clause is intended to prevent sponsorship, financial support, and active <br />involvement of the state in religious activity. Accordingly, a city may not spend public funds for <br />any purpose which has a primary effect of advancing religion Lyncky,Dsimay, 465 U.S. 668, <br />104 S.Ct. 1355, 79 L.Ed.2d (1984). <br />The test for determining whether a governmental act violates the establishment clause is <br />tripartite. First, the law or action in question must reflect a clearly secular Legislative purpose; <br />second, it must have a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion; and, third, it must <br />' avoid excessive government entanglement with religion, Lemony. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602, 91 <br />S.Ct. 2105, 29 L.Ed.2d 745 (1971): <br />Applying the three part analysis to the case at hand, the first question is whether the <br />development project, building and maintaining a community space at St. John's Catholic Church, <br />has a secular purpose. Arguably, if a project meets the "public purpose" standard, it will meet the <br />"secular purpose" standard as well. The establishment and operation of recreational <br />programs/facilities operated either independently or in cooperation with any nonprofit <br />organization, is authorized by statute as a "public purpose ". <br />Obviously, St. John's Catholic Church has a religious dimension In arguing in favor of <br />secular purposes, it would have to be shown that the recreational facility was to provide non- <br />sectarian recreational and health activities without regard for any religious belief or affiliation. In <br />the case In the Matter of the Condemnasionby the Minneapolis Community Development <br />Agency, 439 N.W.2d 708 (Minn. 1989) (attached) the Minnesota Supreme Court found that <br />• although the Y.M.C.A, had a religious dimension, it also provided sectarian services and activities <br />'available to all persons, all religions, races, ages, and needs. However, the obvious distinction in <br />this matter is that the proposed recreational facility is going to be built as a part of St. John's <br />Catholic Church rather than as a separate facility (i.e. located elsewhere). <br />The second question to be asked in determining whether the governmental action violates <br />the establishment clause is that the action must have a primary effect that neither advances nor <br />inhibits religion. In determining whether state aid advances religion in violation of the <br />establishment clause, the test is: <br />Page 6C <br />