05-09-2000 Additions - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

According to 903.020.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance, fences that extend into a front yard must be of construction to provide maximum visibility. The Ordinance does allow, by conditional use permit, variations to the fence requirements which would allow privacy fencing to extend into the front yard. This question can be adequately addressed under the PUD application process. According to the submitted site plan, adequately screened and landscaped. Signage. The site plan does not identify signage is proposed, a signage plan must for review. Existing Buildings and Construction Materials Conformance. Appropriate projects are generally understood to be in conformance with S -3 or I -P (Industrial Park) uses and a higher degree of site design and building material. While these objectives were viewed as absolute for the provision of TIF, they were considered desirable for all development in the district. The City's interest in review of these issues is to ensure that its investment in the TIF supported development is not compromised by substandard projects. It is not necessary for projects to comply with the site layouts prepared by the Kandice Heights developers. However, it is important to be sure that projects do not interfere with the ability for others to comply. In addition, if the City acts to permit additional investment in a particular property which may require acquisition for a larger project at some future date, that acquisition will have to account for the additional investment made in the property. The house and garage and their residential architectural style is out of character with most modern commercial construction. As a result, the policy question which the City must address is whether or not this project will obstruct further development of the district. the site appears to be any proposed signage. If be submitted to the City This was particularly important in the Malsam /Schmieg application in that they intended to expand the buildings which would have increased the cost of the site for any future acquisitions. The Precision Tree application does not propose to renovations to the buildings and therefore the improvements made to the site for this application substantially increase costs on the site and would detriment to possible future costs. Our office does believe that if at some future date, expansions are proposed to the site, that all structures including existing should be built in full compliance with the design and architectural objectives of the district. make any necessary will not not be a 3 PAGE 11