Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 26, 2000 <br />Jim Klasness, Preferred Builders, agreed that two feet was not enough area <br />to install a wrap- around deck on the house. That will have an impact on <br />the owners enjoyment of the house, but a deck is something that is not <br />necessary. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that increasing the easement width <br />from 15 feet to 20 feet only moves the easement about 1 ' feet closer to <br />the house. The rest of the additional easement comes from the north side. <br />Aleks Klidzejs indicated that if it is necessary to have a 20 -foot easement, <br />he would offer that 15 feet come from the Mitchell property and the <br />additional 5 feet come from his property. The 5 -foot easement area from <br />his property, however, should be limited to construction needs should <br />repairs be necessary. The vehicular access portion of the easement would <br />be limited to the 15 feet on the Mitchell property. <br />Fahey stated that he was not adverse to this suggestion provided there was <br />no cost to the City for acquiring the easement. Fahey suggested that City <br />staff look at the options for the easements, both for acquiring the <br />additional easement from the Klidzejs property as well as moving the 45- <br />foot radius cul -de -sac easement so that it would provide access for the <br />Klidzejs property to Mitchell Trail. <br />There was no one present from the general public wishing to comment <br />further on this matter. <br />Upon motion by LaValle, seconded by Pedersen, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -4 -100 — TABLING ACTION ON THE <br />PROPERTY DIVISION FOR 3290 TWIN LAKE ROAD AND <br />INSTRUCTING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO PURSUE <br />EASEMENT OPTIONS FOR BOTH THE SANITARY SEWER <br />EASEMENT AS WELL AS THE MITCHELL TRAIL CUL -DE -SAC <br />EASEMENT AND BRING A RECOMMENDATION BACK TO THE <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Pedersen. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Pedersen, Morelan, Fahey, Scalze. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Page 8 <br />