My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-2000 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
04-26-2000 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2014 1:14:54 PM
Creation date
6/27/2012 8:17:45 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />April 26, 1989 <br />Boosalis replied that there were not at this time. <br />Rlesener asked if the zoning of the property would allow a Rapid Oil Chance <br />type of operation. <br />The City Planner replied that Rapid Oil Change would require a conditional <br />use permit in a B -3 zone. <br />Rlesener asked the separation proposed between the two retail centers under <br />this proposal. <br />Roosalis replied that the separation is wider than originally proposed, <br />pointing out that there is a row of parking proposed along the southern <br />edge of the building as well. <br />Rlesener asked if the full access around the building was a positive or a <br />negative. <br />The City Planner replied that it was positive. <br />Scalze was concerned that the outlot remain for ponding purposes and asked <br />what can be done to insure that. <br />The City Planner suggested that a drainage easement could be taken over the <br />pondinq area. <br />Fahey agreed that it was his understanding that the ponding area would remain <br />undeveloped open space to be used for drainage. <br />Rlesener asked if the majority of the residential property was marshy. <br />Roosalis replied that he has had some soil tests done, and while the property <br />may appear to he marshy, it is not, and there are only a couple of feet of <br />black dirt on the property. Boosalis stated that while there would be some <br />soil correction costs for the second access, the extra access would only add <br />more traffic to the area and the cost has a negative impact on the development. <br />Boosalis pointed out that Public Works is generally opposed to cul -de -sacs <br />since they are more difficult and costly to plow in the winter, however, <br />Rlesener felt that they provided for a better residential area and people <br />preferred to live on a cul -de -sac. <br />Scalze asked if the residential area would drain into the ponding area. <br />The City Engineer replied that he has not thoroughly reviewed the drainage <br />plan as yet, however, the pond will take the overflow drainage from the <br />shopping center.. The pond would then drain into a storm sewer which would <br />go down County Road C and then north and eventually into Round Lake. The <br />City Engineer stated that one of his recommendations is that the existing <br />storm sewer be extended towards Round Lake. <br />Fahey asked about screening from the shopping center to the residential area. <br />Page 149 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.