Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 22, 2000 <br />intense commercial use. RB zoning would provide a use similar to the <br />coffee shop. <br />Morelan stated that he did not feel B -3 zoning was appropriate for these <br />parcels, and felt that they needed to be rezoned. He suggested that in <br />addition to looking at these three parcels, the next four along County Road <br />C should be looked at as well. Morelan felt that RB may be the best long- <br />term plan for the whole stretch of seven properties. <br />Scalze suggested that R -1 also be considered in addition to RB for the <br />three parcels east of the coffee shop. Morelan indicated that he was not <br />interested in looking at R -1 for these properties. He again suggested that <br />the zoning of the outlot be looked at as well. <br />LaValle pointed out that the outlot is a holding pond and is not <br />developable. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -3 -72 —CALLING FORA PUBLIC <br />HEARING ON APRIL 26, 2000 AT 7:30 P.M TO CONSIDER THE <br />REZONING OF 73, 77, AND 83 COUNTY ROAD C FROM B-3 TO <br />EITHER RB OR R -1 AND THE REZONING OF 43, 55, 61, AND 67 <br />COUNTY ROAD CFROMR -1 TO RB <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (3) Scalze, LaValle, Morelan. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Mr. Morelan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -3 -73 —CALLING FOR A PUBLIC <br />HEARING ON APRIL 26, 2000 AT 7:30 P.M TO CONSIDER THE <br />REZONING OF OUTLOT A CENTRE PLACE FROM R -1 TO RB <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (2) Morelan, LaValle. <br />Nays (1). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Scalze suggested that Outlot A be researched to determine whether or not <br />there are any restrictions on it. <br />Page 156 <br />