Laserfiche WebLink
ARTICLE II <br />REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES <br />Section 2.1. Representations and Warranties of the City. The City makes the <br />following representations and warranties: <br />(1) The City is a municipal corporation and has the power to enter into this <br />Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder. <br />(2) The Tax Increment District is a "redevelopment district" within the meaning of <br />Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(a)(1), and was created, adopted and <br />approved in accordance with the terms of the Tax Increment Act. <br />(3) The development contemplated by this Agreement is in conformance with the <br />development objectives set forth in the Development Program. <br />(4) To finance certain costs within the Tax Increment District, the City proposes, <br />subject to the further provisions of this Agreement, to apply Tax Increments to reimburse <br />the Developer for a portion of the cost of the Development Property and the City's initial <br />costs associated with this development as further provided in this Agreement. <br />(5) The City makes no representation or warranty, either express or implied, as to <br />the Development Property or its condition or the soil conditions thereon, or that the <br />Development Property shall be suitable for the Developer's purposes or needs. <br />Section 2.2. Representations and Warranties of the Developer. The Developer <br />makes the following representations and warranties: <br />(1) The Developer is a Minnesota corporation and has power to enter into this <br />Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder and is not in violation of the laws of <br />the State. <br />(2) The Developer shall cause the Project to be constructed in accordance with the <br />terms of this Agreement, the Development Program, and all local, state and federal laws <br />and regulations (including, but not limited to, environmental, zoning, energy <br />conservation, building code and public health laws and regulations). <br />(3) The construction of the Project would not be undertaken by the Developer, and <br />in the opinion of the Developer would not be economically feasible within the reasonably <br />1160667.1 <br />page 218 <br />